trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
High quality mirrors use aluminum coatings instead of silver due to durability and UV reflectivity
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

The available literature partially supports the use of aluminum coatings for mirrors due to durability reasons, but does not fully establish the combined claims regarding UV reflectivity advantages over silver.

Evidence for · 2
1949 · cited by 0
An evaporation method is described for producing front-surface mirrors with good abrasion, corrosion, and reflection qualities. Aluminum is used as the reflecting material because evaporated aluminum films have high reflectivity in all useful spectral ranges and show, in the electron microscope, a much finer grain and smoother surface than similar silver coatings. Since direct evaporation of SiO2 is difficult and yields loose layers, a lower oxide of silicon, silicon monoxide, was investigated and found to produce good quality protective films. Silicon monoxide evaporates at a much lower temperature than silicon or silicon dioxide and deposits on the mirror surface in uniform and adherent layers which, when exposed to the atmosphere, partially oxidize to SiO2. The visual reflectivity of aluminum mirrors protected with an optimum thickness (about 1500A) of SiO is about 89 percent, or only one percent lower than that of the unprotected aluminum surface. In the infra-red from 2μ to 8μ these layers do not show any appreciable absorption; however, the absorption band characteristic of silicon oxides appears between 8μ and 10μ. In the ultraviolet the SiO layer shows absorption which varies with the evaporation conditions. This absorption can be decreased by an oxidizing treatment. The SiO-protected mirror is unaffected by prolonged heating in air at 400C, and is highly resistant to sea water, sodium hydroxide, and most acids. The SiO-protected mirror also shows good abrasion resist Radware Captcha Page We apologize for the inconvenience... ...but your activity and behavior on this site made us think that you are a bot. Note: A number of things could be going on here. If you are attempting to access this site using an anonymous Private/Proxy network, please disable that and try accessing site again. Due to previously detected malicious behavior which originated from the network you're using, please request unblock to site.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:partial_only:for=0+2p:against=0+0p | v55:multi_partial_one_side:lean=lean_partial:for:one_sided

More for · 1
cited by 0
# Why did high quality mirrors use aluminum coatings instead of silver? Tags: optics, reflection, telescopes - Score: 34 - Views: 21471 - Answers: 6 - Answered: yes - Asked by: Carlos (4648 rep) - Asked: 2014-06-02 - Edited: 2016-03-31 - Site: physics ## Question I have two questions on mirrors. I’ve read that in the past quality mirrors were coated with silver but that today vacuum evaporated coatings of aluminum are the accepted standard. When I look at the reflectance vs. wavelength plot, I see that silver has a higher reflectance than aluminum. So why use aluminum instead of silver? If one wants the highest quality mirrors I assume that cost is secondary, so what is the physics that I am missing here? Why are the more “technical mirrors” (I am not sure what this means but I assume more precise?) front-surfaced instead of back-surfaced? ## Answers ### Answer by Johannes (score: 35 [ACCEPTED]) Telescope mirrors and other mirrors used by scientists telescopes regularly do use a silver coating. See for instance here. However, aluminum coating are the norm (certainly for the large primary mirrors deployed in telescopes) because of durability reasons. I quote from the text
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Silicon Monoxide Protected Front-Surface Mirrors*peer-reviewedno side taken
  2. Why did high quality mirrors use aluminum coatings instead of silver?referenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 001 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt