Heinrich Himmler's memo regarding genocide is authentic and historically significant.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
Historical sources confirm the authenticity and analytical significance of Heinrich Himmler's memorandum concerning racial policies and the treatment of populations in the East.
# Is Himmler's memo about genocide authentic? Significant?
Tags: world-war-two, nazi-germany, holocaust, nazism
- Score: 10
- Views: 1024
- Answers: 3
- Answered: yes
- Asked by: Jeff (3849 rep)
- Asked: 2017-07-27
- Edited: 2017-07-27
- Site: history
## Question
In this bio of Yehuda Bauer, we see mention of a Himmler memo to Hitler (dated May 25, 1940): Himmler states his rejection of "the Bolshevik method of physical annihilation of a people out of inner conviction as un-German and impossible,"
Is this considered authentic and if so, how important is this? It would seem to indicate that pretty late in the game Himmler at least, don't know about others at that level, was against mass murder and that they changed their minds pretty fast for an apparently trivial reason -- Madagascar became impractical/inaccessible.
## Answers
### Answer by Felix Goldberg (score: 12)
Authenticity
The memorandum, titled "Reflection on the Treatment of Peoples of Alien Races in the East", is certainly genuine.
Though if I understand correctly, what we have is not the memorandum (said to be
6 pages long) itself, but rather Himmler's own summary of it and his further notes to self on diss