trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Heating potassium chlorate is classified as a disproportionation reaction
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 1 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Chemical literature explicitly refutes the classification of potassium chlorate heating as a disproportionation reaction, noting it is simply a redox reaction where chlorine decreases and oxygen increases in oxidation state.

Evidence against · 1
cited by 0
# Will heating of KClO3 be considered disproportionation? - Tags: inorganic-chemistry, redox - Score: 8 - Views: 4,277 - Answers: 1 - Asked by: himanshu (193 rep) - Asked on: May 14, 2019 - Last active: May 14, 2019 - License: CC BY-SA 4.0 --- ## Question In all examples of disproportionation I have seen, there is one particular atom whose oxidation state is both increasing and decreasing to give rise to different products For example, on heating phosphorous acid $$\\ce{4 H3PO3 -> 3 H3PO4 + PH3}$$ the oxidation state of phosphorous changes from +3 to +5 and -3. However, in the case of heating $\\ce{KClO3}$ $$\\ce{2 KClO3 -> 2 KCl + 3 O2}$$ the oxidation state of oxygen changes from -2 to 0, while that of chlorine changes from +5 to -1. So, will such a reaction be called a disproportionation since its the same molecule giving rise to two products, or will it be simply a redox reaction? --- ## Accepted Answer — Score: 16 - By: andselisk (38,821 rep) - Answered on: May 14, 2019 Thermal decomposition of potassium chlorate is _not_ disproportionation, just a redox reaction. [Disproportionation](https://goldbook.iupac.org/html/D/D01799.html) refers to the _same element_ act
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:single_source:for=0+0p:against=1+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Will heating of KClO3 be considered disproportionation?referenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 5205 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt