trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Hawking radiation and Unruh radiation are physically equivalent phenomena.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 2 against

Peer-reviewed literature demonstrates that detailed comparisons of Unruh and Hawking effects reveal discrepancies in their behaviors and measurements, indicating they are not physically equivalent phenomena.

Evidence against · 2
2011 · cited by 72
We compare the response function of an Unruh-DeWitt detector for different space-times and different vacua and show that there is a detailed violation of the equivalence principle. In particular comparing the response of an accelerating detector to a detector at rest in a Schwarzschild space-time we find that both detectors register thermal radiation, but for a given, equivalent acceleration the fixed detector in the Schwarzschild space-time measures a higher temperature. This allows one to locally distinguish the two cases. As one approaches the horizon the two temperatures have the same limit so that the equivalence principle is restored at the horizon.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:for=0+0p:against=2+0p | v55:sufficiency

More against · 1
2022 · cited by 12
Abstract The physical observables of quantum theory can be described by perturbation theory, which is often given by diverging power series. This divergence is connected to the existence of non-perturbative phenomena, where resurgence allows us to study this connection. Applying this idea to the WKB expansion, the exact WKB analysis gives a clear connection to non-perturbative phenomena. In this paper, we apply the exact WKB analysis to the Unruh effect and Hawking radiation. The mechanism we found in this paper is similar to the Schwinger effect of a constant electric field, where the background is static but the Stokes phenomenon appears in the temporal part. Comparing this with a sonic black hole, our calculations show a clear discrepancy between them. Then, we briefly explain how quantum backreactions can be included in the exact WKB formalism. The Exact WKB analysis and the Stokes phenomena of the Unruh effect and Hawking radiation | Journal of High Energy Physics | Springer Nature Link Skip to main content Advertisement The Exact WKB analysis and the Stokes phenomena of the Unruh effect and Hawking radiation Regular Article - Theoretical Physics Open access Published: 07 December 2022 Volume 2022 , article number  37 ( 2022 ) Cite this article You have full access to this open access article Download PDF Save article View saved research Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript The Exact WKB analysis and the Stokes phenomena of the Unruh effect and Hawking radiation Download PDF A bstract The physical observables of quantum theory can be described by perturbation theory, which is often given by diverging power series. This divergence is connected to the existence of non-perturbative phenomena, where resurgence allows us to study this connection. Applying this idea to the WKB expansion, the exact WKB analysis gives a clear connection to non-perturbative phenomena. In this paper, we apply the exact WKB analysis to the Unruh effect and Hawking radiation. The mechanism we found in this paper is similar to the Schwinger effect of a constant electric field, where the background is static but the Stokes phenomenon appears in the temporal part. Comparing this with a sonic black hole, our calculations show a clear discrepancy between them. Gravitational Physics Mathematical Physics Nanophysics Physical Sciences Quantum Fluids and Solids Quantum Physics References M.V. Berry and K.E. Mount, Semiclassical approximations in wave mechanics , Rept. Prog. Phys. 35 (1972) 315 [ INSPIRE ]. L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics , Pergamon (1974) [DOI]. M.K. Parikh and F. Wilczek, Hawking radiation as tunneling , Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 5042 [ hep-th/9907001 ] [ INSPIRE ]. Article ADS MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar C.K. Dumlu, Stokes phenomenon and Hawking radiation , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 125006 [ arXiv:2009.09851 ] [ INSPIRE ]. V. Akhmedova, T. Pilling, A. de Gill and D. Singleton, Temporal contribution to gravitational WKB-like calculations , Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 269 [ arXiv:0804.2289 ] [ INSPIRE ]. Article ADS MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar A. de Gill, D. Singleton, V. Akhmedova and T. Pilling, A WKB-Like Approach to Unruh Radiation , Am. J. Phys. 78 (2010) 685 [ arXiv:1001.4833 ] [ INSPIRE ]. Article ADS Google Scholar P. Kraus and F. Wilczek, Effect of selfinteraction on charged black hole radiance , Nucl. Phys. B 437 (1995) 231 [ hep-th/9411219 ] [ INSPIRE ]. Article ADS Google Scholar E. Keski-Vakkuri and P. Kraus, Microcanonical D-branes and back reaction , Nucl. Phys. B 491 (1997) 249 [ hep-th/9610045 ] [ INSPIRE ]. Article ADS MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar K. Srinivasan and T. Padmanabhan, Particle production and complex path analysis , Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 024007 [ gr-qc/9812028 ] [ INSPIRE ]. R. Banerjee and B.R. Majhi, Hawking black body spectrum from tunneling mechanism , Phys. Lett. B 675 (2009) 243 [ arXiv:0903.0250 ] [ INSPIRE ]. Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar S. Shankaranarayanan, T. Padmanabhan and K. Srinivasan, Hawking radiation in different coordinate settings: Complex paths approach , Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 2671 [ gr-qc/0010042 ] [ INSPIRE ]. M. Arzano, A.J.M. Medved and E.C. A 55 (2022) 454003 [ arXiv:2204.09062 ] [ INSPIRE ]. K. Imaizumi, Quasi-normal modes for the D3-branes and Exact WKB analysis , Phys. Lett. B 834 (2022) 137450 [ arXiv:2207.09961 ] [ INSPIRE ]. W.G. Unruh, Notes on black hole evaporation , Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 870 [ INSPIRE ]. S.W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes , Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199 [ Erratum ibid. 46 (1976) 206] [ INSPIRE ]. S. Enomoto and T. Matsuda, The Exact WKB analysis for asymmetric scalar preheating , arXiv:2203.04497 [ INSPIRE ]. T. Koike, On the Exact WKB Analysis of Second Order Linear Ordinary Differential Equations with Simple Poles , Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci 36 (2000) 297. Haro, Topics in Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space , arXiv:1011.4772 [ INSPIRE ]. J.S. Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization , Phys. Rev. 82 (1951) 664 [ INSPIRE ]. Article ADS MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar S. Giovanazzi, Hawking radiation in sonic black holes , Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 061302 [ physics/0411064 ] [ INSPIRE ]. T. Aoki, J. Yoshida, Microlocal Reduction of Ordinary Differential Operators with a Large Parameter , Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci 29 (1993) 959. Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar T. Aoki, K. Iwaki and T. A r X iv e P rint : 2203.04501 Rights and permissions Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( CC-BY 4.0 ), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Reprints and permissions About this article Cite this article Enomoto, S., Matsuda, T. The Exact WKB analysis and the Stokes phenomena of the Unruh effect and Hawking radiation. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022 , 37 (2022).
Everything we examined (3) — 2 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. The Exact WKB analysis and the Stokes phenomena of the Unruh effect and Hawking radiationpeer-reviewedsame source L2no side taken
  2. The Exact WKB analysis and the Stokes phenomena of the Unruh effect and Hawking radiationpeer-reviewedsame source L2no side taken
  3. Hawking radiation, Unruh radiation, and the equivalence principle.peer-reviewedno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
held for human review09 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt