Gravitational fields gravitate through the non-linear terms in Einstein field equations
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
Reference materials and physics literature establish that the non-linearity of Einstein's field equations arises because gravitational fields carry energy and momentum, causing gravity to gravitate and couple to itself.
definition for the concept of invariant mass in general relativity. At the core of the problem is the non-linearity of the Einstein field equations, making it
In physics, mass is an intrinsic positive physical quantity of a body, which measures its resistance to acceleration. In modern physics, it is generally defined as the strength of an object's gravitational attraction to other bodies — as measured by an observer moving along at the same speed. The unit of mass in the International System of Units (SI) is the kilogram (kg). Since 1905, mass can also
In…
In everyday usage, mass and "weight" are often used interchangeably. For instance, a person's weight may be stated as 75 kg. In a constant gravitational field, the weight of an object is proportional to its mass, and it is unproblematic to use the same unit for both concepts. But because of slight differences in the strength of the Earth's gravitational field at different places, the distinction becomes important for measurements with a precision better than a few percent, and for places far from the surface of the Earth, such as in space or on other planets. Conceptually, "mass" (measured in kilograms) refers to an intrinsic property of an object, whereas "weight" (measured in newtons) measures an object's resistance to deviating from its current course of free fall, which can be influenced by the nearby gravitational field. No matter how strong the gravitational field, objects in free fall are weightless, though they still have mass.
The force known as "weight" is proportional to mass and acceleration in all situations where the mass is accelerated away from free fall. For example, when a body is at rest in a gravitational field (rather than in free fall), it must be accelerated by a force from a scale or the surface of a planetary body such as the Earth or the Moon. This force keeps the object from going into free fall. Weight is the opposing force in such circumstances and is thus determined by the acceleration of free fall. On the surface of the Earth, for example, an object with a mass of 50 kilograms weighs 491 newtons, which means that 491 newtons is being applied to keep the object from going into free fall. By contrast, on the surface of the Moon, the same object still has a mass of 50 kilograms but weighs only 81.5 newtons, because only 81.5 newtons is required to keep this object from going into a free fall on the moon. Restated in mathematical terms, on the surface of the Earth, the weight W of an object is related to its mass m by W = mg, where g = 9.80665 m/s2 is the acceleration due to Earth's gravitational field, (expressed as the acceleration experienced by a free-falling object).
For other situations, such as when objects are subjected to mechanical accelerations from forces other than the resistance of a planetary surface, the weight force is proportional to the mass of an object multiplied by the total acceleration away from free fall, which is called the proper acceleration. Through such mechanisms, objects in elevators, vehicles, centrifuges, and the like, may experience weight forces many times those caused by resistance to the effects of gravity on objects, resulting from planetary surfaces. In such cases, the generalized equation for weight W of an object is related to its mass m by the equation W = –ma, where a is the proper acceleration of the object caused by all influences other than gravity. (Again, if gravity is the only influence, such as occurs when an object falls freely, its weight will be zero).
The universality of free-fall only applies to systems in which gravity is the only acting force. All other forces, especially friction and air resistance, must be absent or at least negligible. For example, if a hammer and a feather are dropped from the same height through the air on Earth, the feather will take much longer to reach the ground; the feather is not really in free-fall because the force of air resistance upwards against the feather is comparable to the downward force of gravity. On the other hand, if the experiment is performed in a vacuum, in which there is no air resistance, the hammer and the feather should hit the ground at exactly the same time (assuming the acceleration of both objects towards each other, and of the ground towards both objects, for its own part, is negligible). This can easily be done in a high school laboratory by dropping the objects in transparent tubes that have the air removed with a vacuum pump. It is even more dramatic when done in an environment that naturally has a vacuum, as David Scott did on the surface of the Moon during Apollo 15.
A stronger version of the equivalence principle, known as the Einstein equivalence principle or the strong equivalence principle, lies at the heart of the general theory of relativity. Einstein's equivalence principle states that within sufficiently small regions of spacetime, it is impossible to distinguish between a uniform acceleration and a uniform gravitational field. Thus, the theory postulates that the force acting on a massive object caused by a gravitational field is a result of the object's
In general relativity, the equivalence principle is the equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass. At the core of this assertion is Albert Einstein's idea that the gravitational force as experienced locally while standing on a massive body (such as the Earth) is the same as the pseudo-force experienced by an observer in a non-inertial (i.e. accelerated) frame of reference.
However, it turns out that it is impossible to find an objective general definition for the concept of invariant mass in general relativity. At the core of the problem is the non-linearity of the Einstein field equations, making it impossible to write the gravitational field energy as part of the stress–energy tensor in a way that is invariant for all observers. For a given observer, this can be achieved by the stress–energy–momentum pseudotensor.
arXiv:gr-qc/0411023v3 1 Nov 2014
Self-Interaction and Gauge Invariance
S. Deser
1
Physics Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA
and Nordita, Copenhagen
Received: 17 October 1969
This article, the first paper in Gen. Rel. Grav. [1 (1970) 9], is now
somewhat inaccessible; the present posting is the original version, with
a few subsequent references appended.
Abstract
A simple unified closed form derivation of the non-linearities of the Einstein, Yang-Mills and
spinless (e.g., chiral) meson systems is given. For the first two, the non-linearities are required by
locality and consistency; in all cases, they are determined by the conserved currents associated
with the initial (linear) gauge invariance of the first kind. Use of first-order formalism leads
uniformly to a simple cubic self-interaction.
Introduction
The Maxwell and Einstein fields are, respectively, the most and least linear of gauge theories.
The electrical neutrality of the photon reflects the absence of self-interaction, while at the
other extreme, the gravitational field equations are an infinite series in the metric due to the
gravitational ‘weight’ of gravitons and of their interaction energy. Between these ext
[hep-th/9505114] Nonlinear couplings and tree amplitudes in gauge theories
# Nonlinear couplings and tree amplitudes in gauge theories
F. T. Brandt and J. Frenkel Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 05389-970 SP, Brasil
###### Abstract
Following a remark advanced by Feynman, we study the connection between the form of the nonlinear vertices involving gauge particles and the Abelian gauge invariance of physical tree amplitudes. We show that this requirement, together with some natural assumptions, fixes uniquely the structure of the Yang-Mills theory. However, the constraints imposed by the above property are not sufficient to single out the gauge theory of gravitation.
## I Introduction
In the Yang-Mills theory, the source of the Yang-Mills fields is the conserved color current. Since these fields carry color, these will self-interact leading to a non-Abelian gauge theory [1]. Similarly, the source of the gravitational fields is the energy-momentum tensor, a quantity which is locally conserved. These fields carry energy and momentum and hence must couple to themselves. The non-Abelian gauge theory of gravitation, which is invariant under local gauge tra
Everything we examined (3) — 2 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.