trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Glass ionomer cement and zinc oxide are common white dental filling materials
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
4 sources for · 0 against

Glass ionomer cement and zinc oxide are well-documented dental restorative and cementing materials, supported by multiple clinical and review studies.

Evidence for · 4
Glass‐ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject?
2011 · cited by 120
Paper 0 discusses glass-ionomer cements as tooth-colored restorative materials.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently confirm that glass ionomer cement and zinc oxide (such as zinc oxide-eugenol) are standard materials utilized in dental restorations, bases, and cementation.

More for · 3
Bioactive restorative materials in dentistry: a comprehensive review of mechanisms, clinical applications, and future directions.
2026 · cited by 9
Paper 2 evaluates glass ionomer cements as direct bioactive restorative materials.
The effect of the petroleum jelly on the hardness of Zinc Oxide Eugenol dental cement
2018 · cited by 1
Paper 6 discusses zinc oxide eugenol as a dental cement used for temporary filling materials and bases.
Comparison of Mechanical and Surface Properties of Glass Ionomer, Resin-modified Glass Ionomer, and Alkasite Restorative Materials.
2026 · cited by 0
Paper 8 analyzes glass ionomer cements as established restorative materials in dentistry.
Everything we examined (12)
We also searched for evidence AGAINST this claim, not only for it.
  1. Glass‐ionomer cement restorative materials: a sticky subject?peer-reviewedsupports
  2. Clinical Studies of Dental Cements: V. Recall Evaluation of Restorations Cemented with a Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement and a Zinc Phosphate Cementpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. Bioactive restorative materials in dentistry: a comprehensive review of mechanisms, clinical applications, and future directions.peer-reviewedsupports
  4. Clinical Studies of Dental Cements: IV. A Preliminary Study of a Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement for Final Cementationpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  5. The Impact of Environmental and Material Factors on Fluoride Release from Metal-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. Caries Direction Antimicrobial Activity of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Containing Cement for the Management of Orthodontic Teeth against <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> and <i>Lactobacillus casei</i>.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. The effect of the petroleum jelly on the hardness of Zinc Oxide Eugenol dental cementpeer-reviewedsupports
  8. Influence of two pediatric multivitamin forms on surface characteristics and color stability of single-shade composite, nanofilled composite, and glass ionomer cement: an in vitro study.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  9. Comparison of Mechanical and Surface Properties of Glass Ionomer, Resin-modified Glass Ionomer, and Alkasite Restorative Materials.peer-reviewedsupports
  10. Comparison of the Effect of Simulated Gastric Acid on the Surface Properties of Different Fluoride-Releasing Dental Restorative Materials.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  11. Correction: Effect of particle size reduction on the physicochemical and mechanical properties of conventional glass ionomer cement.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  12. An <i>in vitro</i> comparative study on the flexural strength of different restorative materials.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8806 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt