trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Geographical coordinates are defined on non-spheroid celestial bodies using standardized cartographic systems
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Official reports and international standards from bodies like the U.S. Geological Survey and the IAU Working Group establish that standardized cartographic systems and coordinate definitions are applied to planets and celestial bodies throughout the solar system.

Evidence for · 2
cited by 0
International Mapping Standards Updated for Planets throughout Solar System | U.S. Geological Survey Skip to main content # International Mapping Standards Updated for Planets throughout Solar System By Communications and Publishing Clarifying Latitude and Longitude for Planets besides Earth The internationally agreed upon standards for mapping planets and objects other than Earth throughout the solar system have been updated in a new report led by the U.S. Geological Survey. These standards include definitions of the latitude and longitude systems and body size and shape for all mapped objects. The new parameters can be universally used by planetary science researchers to assign geographic position information to their data sets, allowing them to be registered and compared at known levels of accuracy and precision. “These new standards ensure that anyone around the world, including individual scientists, instrument teams, spacecraft missions and space agencies, can make maps and geographically register information that can be compared and used interchangeably,” said Brent Archinal, a USGS scientist and the lead author of the study. “The recommended parameters will also allow
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 1
cited by 0
Celest Mech Dyn Astr (2018) 130:22 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-017-9805-5 Report of the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements: 2015 B. A. Archinal1 · C. H. Acton2 · M. F. A’Hearn3 · A. Conrad4 · G. J. Consolmagno5 · T. Duxbury6 · D. Hestroffer7 · J. L. Hilton8 · R. L. Kirk9 · S. A. Klioner10 · D. McCarthy11 · K. Meech12 · J. Oberst13 · J. Ping14 · P. K. Seidelmann15 · D. J. Tholen16 · P. C. Thomas17 · I. P. Williams18 Received: 3 October 2017 / Accepted: 27 October 2017 © Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature (outside the USA) 2018 Abstract This report continues the practice where the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements revises recommendations regarding those topics for the planets, satellites, minor planets, and comets approximately every 3 years. The Working M. F. A’Hearn deceased on 2017 May 29. B B. A. Archinal barchinal@usgs.gov 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ, USA 2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, USA 3 University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA 4 Large Binocular Telescope Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA 5 Vatican Observatory, Vatican City, Hol
Everything we examined (2) — 1 independent source
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. International Mapping Standards Updated for Planets throughout Solar System | U.S. Geological Surveyreferencesame source L13no side taken
  2. Report of the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements: 2015referencesame source L13no side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 005 Aug 2026
held for human review11 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt