trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Gentle pipetting and isotonic buffers resuspend cell pellets without harming bacteria.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against

Reference literature and expert guides indicate that bacteria such as E. coli are robust and can be safely resuspended from cell pellets using appropriate buffers and trituration techniques like gentle pipetting.

Evidence for · 3
2013 · cited by 0
Assuming that you are talking about E. coli : As long as you are resuspending the cells in a suitable liquid, e.g. fresh medium or buffer, then from my experience you don't have much to worry about - the cells are very robust. I've found that different strains and growth conditions give pellets with very different qualities - some will resuspend quite well with vortexing. If the pellet seems clumpy then trituration is something that I always found to work - pipette up and down until the pellet breaks up. If you were going to do some kind of physiological measurement with the resuspended cells then it might require some checking, but if you only intend to regrow and induce expression I would say that giving the cells some time to recover in the new medium (check that absorbance is increasing) before inducing expression should be enough.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+2p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 2
2019 · cited by 0
The reason this centrifugation/resuspension step is done has a simple reason: It concentrates the bacteria in a much smaller volume which is much easier to handle afterwards. For a maxiprep you typically have a culture volume between 250 and 500ml, depending on the copy number of the plasmid. After centrifugation the pellet is resuspended in 10ml of Buffer P1, for lysis another 10ml of buffer P2 are added, for neutralization 10ml of P3. Imagine doing this with 500ml culture volume - adding 500ml of each P2 and P3. This might work for a miniprep, but definitely not for larger volumes. Additionally, the centrifugation steps are carried out at high g numbers - typically something around 15.000xg. Doing this with this really high volumes is complicated and needs big centrifuges, which a lot of people are not trained anymore to operate or have available.
cited by 0
Metacyclic forms placed in 25 cm2 T-type (T-25) flasks rapidly attached to the bottom of the flasks and transformed to bloodstream forms during the initial 24 h and continued to proliferate. The bloodstream forms isolated from the infected mouse blood by means of diethylaminoethyl cellulose (DE52) column chromatography also continued to proliferate in the flasks. Cultures were maintained by replacing the medium every 24 h. Every 4-5 days, the attached bloodstream forms were resuspended in fresh medium by gentle pipetting and then were subcultured. The method was further simplified by initiating primary cultures directly with 10 microliters of the tail blood of infected mice in 24-well culture plates and then by subcultivating either in wells or in T-25 flasks. The shortest population doubling time, 9 h, was achieved by seeding subcultures with 10(6) bloodstream forms/ml. The bloodstream forms propagated in this system were morphologically similar to those seen in infected mouse blood, they were covered with a surface coat as examined by electron microscopy and they were infective to mice. Published in Parasitology (1991)
Everything we examined (3) — 2 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. How can I resuspend a cell pellet without harming the bacteria?referencesame source L2no side taken
  2. Why pellet and resuspend E. coli for plasmid prepreferencesame source L2no side taken
  3. PubMed: In vitro cultivation of Trypanosoma congolense bloodstream forms in the absence of feeder cell layers.peer-reviewedno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt