trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Frequent exposure to a word increases the instinctive use of that word in adults
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
4 sources for · 0 against

Evidence from psycholinguistic studies demonstrates that frequent exposure to specific words or grammatical structures increases their subsequent use by adults, a phenomenon commonly investigated via structural and lexical priming.

Evidence for · 4
2006 · cited by 47
Salamoura and Williams (2006) demonstrate that presenting a single verb prime initiates syntactic priming, showing that recent linguistic experience alters structural usage.
See more details
The analysis

The claim states that frequent exposure to a word increases the instinctive use of that word in adults. This is a well-established psychological and linguistic phenomenon known as priming or structural priming. Multiple retrieved papers (such as [0], [4], [6], and [9]) investigate and confirm this effect, demonstrating that prior exposure to linguistic items directly increases their subsequent production and use in adults. No retrieved papers refute this well-documented finding, so the verdict is SUPPORTED.

More for · 3
2024 · cited by 10
Aphasia research by Pickering et al. (2024) confirms that structural priming—the tendency to repeat previously encountered sentence structures—supports implicit learning and language use in adults.
2023 · cited by 6
Research by Pickering and colleagues (2023) shows robust priming effects in adults, where hearing a specific sentence structure increases the immediate production of that same structure.
2024 · cited by 3
A state-of-the-art review by independent researchers (2024) notes that structural priming reflects speakers' tacit reuse of previously encountered syntactic structures in subsequent production and comprehension.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8604 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt