trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Freezing an aqueous solution always causes water to separate and form a pure ice lattice

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Freezing an aqueous solution does not always form a pure ice lattice, as rapid cooling or high solute concentrations can lead to vitrification or amorphous freeze-concentrated structures rather than pure ice separation.

The analysis

The claim states that freezing an aqueous solution 'always' causes water to separate and form a pure ice lattice. However, physical chemistry and thermodynamics show that freezing aqueous solutions can result in amorphous glass transitions, vitrification, or noncrystalline freeze-concentrated structures depending on the cooling rate and solute composition. Papers [3] and [4] explicitly discuss vitrification and glass transitions in frozen aqueous systems, directly refuting the absoluteness of the claim.

Evidence against · 2
Recorded source metadata

Roos YH. Glass Transition and Re-Crystallization Phenomena of Frozen Materials and Their Effect on Frozen Food Quality.. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020447

Discusses how freezing aqueous solutions (such as sucrose) produces noncrystalline, freeze-concentrated structures and glass transitions rather than pure ice lattices exclusively.

See more details
More against · 1
Recorded source metadata

Qiu M, Sun P, Liang Y, Chen J, Wang ZL, Mai W. Tailoring tetrahedral and pair-correlation entropies of glass-forming liquids for energy storage applications at ultralow temperatures.. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54449-x

Demonstrates that aqueous solutions can experience vitrification (glass transition) instead of ice crystallization depending on cooling conditions and solute interactions.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked02 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1802 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt