trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Fog-bows reduce perceived color through droplet size diffraction effects
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Reference material on fog bows reports that their weak coloration and faded appearance are caused by droplet size diffraction effects.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
Fog bow Fogbow over a field 360-degree fogbow A fog bow, sometimes called a white rainbow, [1] is a phenomenon similar to a rainbow; however, as its name suggests, it appears as a bow in fog rather than rain. [2] Because of the very small size of water droplets that cause fog—smaller than 0.05 millimeters (0.0020 in)—the fog bow has only very weak colors, with a red outer edge and bluish inner edge. [3] The colors fade due to being smeared out by the diffraction effect of the smaller droplets. [4] In many cases, when the droplets are very small, fog bows appear white, and are therefore sometimes called white rainbows. Along with its larger angular size, this lack of color is a feature of a fog bow that distinguishes it from a glory, which has multiple pale-colored rings caused by diffraction. When droplets forming it are almost all of the same size, the fog bow can have multiple inner rings, or supernumeraries, which are more strongly colored than the main bow. Fogbow over the ocean A fog bow seen in clouds, typically from an aircraft looking downwards, is called a cloud bow. Mariners sometimes call fog bows sea-dogs. ## Direction A fog bow is seen in the same direction as
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Fog bowreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 004 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt