trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Fluorine atoms preferentially occupy axial bonds in phosphorus pentachloride
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Reference literature on pentacoordinated phosphorus indicates that fluorine atoms preferentially occupy axial positions.

Evidence for · 2
1980 · cited by 0
axial fluorine atoms (the splitting caused by the phosphorus and equatorial fluorine atoms) and … than the basal bonds. Also, fluorine atoms preferentially occupy axial positions in the trigonal … occupancy is revealed (Table 2.8). Fluorine atoms occupy axial positions when they are present
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 1
1973 · cited by 0
and the e-fluorine atoms. PCI, F, 1828/34/35: A TBP structure, with the two fluorine atoms in axial positions … equivalence of the fluorine atoms attached to P as well as of the fluorine atoms attached to carbon, … ring atoms attached to phosphorus. Compounds having only carbon ring atoms attached to phosphorus will
Everything we examined (2) — 1 independent source
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Pentacoordinated phosphorusreferencesame source L1no side taken
  2. Dynamic stereochemistry of pentaco-ordinated phosphorus and related elementsreferencesame source L1no side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 001 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt