Famines are a necessary consequence of communist rule
Historical analysis shows that while devastating famines occurred under communist regimes due to extreme government policies, agricultural collectivization did not invariably lead to mass starvation, proving that famines are not a necessary consequence of communist rule.
The claim asserts that famines are a necessary consequence of communist rule. Paper [0] explicitly argues that there is no necessary relation between collectivization and famine, as collective agriculture often existed for decades without mass starvation, linking past famines instead to specific overambitious industrialization policies and government decisions. Paper [1] shows that while collectivization caused severe hardship across Soviet regions, it did not always result in mass starvation everywhere. Therefore, the evidence refutes the claim that famine is a necessary outcome.
Felix Wemheuer. Collectivization and Famine. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199602056.013.023
The paper argues that there is no necessary relation between agricultural collectivization under communist rule and famine, noting that collective agriculture was often established for decades without mass starvation.
See more details
Marianne Kamp. Famine. 2024. https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501777998.003.0007
The chapter demonstrates that while collectivization caused severe hunger and hardship across various Soviet regions, it did not uniformly result in mass starvation in every instance.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
Challenge the receipt
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt