Exhausting a spent lower rocket stage can function as reaction mass for propulsion.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 1 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
Retrieved technical discussions indicate that cannibalizing and burning the structural material of a spent rocket stage to serve as reaction mass is considered impractical and would fail to generate meaningful thrust.
# Burn 1st stage structural material as fuel?
Tags: propulsion, advanced-propulsion, solid-fuel
- Score: 8
- Views: 562
- Answers: 3
- Answered: yes
- Asked by: user12102
- Asked: 2016-05-31
- Edited: 2017-04-13
- Site: space
## Question
Aluminum/Magnesium alloys can burn quite nicely. The stoichiometry is favoriable. Instead of $CO_2$ which is mostly oxidizer by mass, you might end up with $Al_2O_3$ and $MgO$ as exhaust.
The question Using lower stage as reaction mass and answer got me thinking - what if reaction mass referred to a chemical reaction and not just a kinematic reaction?
However I can't imagine any possible way to actually cannibalize the structural material of a spent stage and then burn it. One problem is that the metal oxides of the exhaust are basically "ceramics" and even at very high temperatures they might agglomerate into nanoparticles, basically "glass soot". They'd be hot, but there may be little gas or volume and therefore little pressure and therefore little thrust.
Has this every been considered & written about in any semi-scientific way?
## Answers
### Answer by user20636 (score: 3 [ACCEPTED])
This Scottish/Ukranian design doesn't use a metal b