Every chemical reaction is in equilibrium

the verdict

REFUTED

the evidence says no

Recorded sources

0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Not all chemical reactions are in equilibrium; many operate far from equilibrium or under conditions that deliberately suppress reversibility.

The analysis

The claim states that every chemical reaction is in equilibrium, which is scientifically false. Many chemical systems and active matter operate far from thermodynamic equilibrium, transcending detailed balance and reversibility constraints as shown in the literature.

Evidence against · 2

Building with Light: Photoactive Colloids as the Next Generation Meta-Atoms.

Recorded source metadata

Liu J, Li X, Li Y, Yang R, Wang W, Zheng J, Tang J. Building with Light: Photoactive Colloids as the Next Generation Meta-Atoms.. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6c00990

Active colloids and systems operating far from equilibrium inherently transcend fundamental constraints such as detailed balance.

Source citation format

See more details

More against · 1

Structural Modulation of TpPa‑1 Covalent Organic Framework in Flow Synthesis Guided by Green Chemistry Principles.

Recorded source metadata

Xu Y, Rog N, Mollart C, Gryn'ova G, Trewin A, Lau CH. Structural Modulation of TpPa‑1 Covalent Organic Framework in Flow Synthesis Guided by Green Chemistry Principles.. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsengineeringau.5c00114

Specific solvent choices can hinder excessive reaction reversibility, demonstrating that not all chemical processes operate in equilibrium.

Source citation format

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked01 Aug 2026

judged → REFUTED · 1001 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt