trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Equally lean red meat and poultry have different health impacts
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against

Selected studies indicate nutritional and health outcome differences when comparing red meat and poultry intake, though evidence specifically isolating equally lean cuts remains partial.

Evidence for · 3
2017 · cited by 88
<h4>Background</h4>Previous meta-analyses on meat intake and risk of stroke did not report the effect of white meat (poultry meat, excluding fish) and did not examine stroke incidence and mortality separately. We aimed to investigate the relationship of total (red and processed meat), red (unprocessed or fresh red meat), and processed (processed red meat) consumption along with white meat on risk of stroke incidence and mortality.<h4>Methods and results</h4>Articles were identified from databases and reference lists of relevant studies up to October 28, 2016. We selected prospective cohort studies on meat consumption specified by types of meat and stroke incidence and mortality reporting relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. The pooled relative risk was estimated using the random-effects model. Based on the inclusion criteria, 10 articles containing 15 studies (5 articles with 7 studies including 9522 cases of stroke incidence and 254 742 participants and 5 articles with 8 studies containing 12 999 cases of stroke mortality and 487 150 participants) were selected for quantitative synthesis. The pooled relative risks (95% confidence intervals) for total, red, processed and white meat consumption and total stroke incidence were 1.18 (1.09-1.28), 1.11 (1.03-1.20), 1.17 (1.08-1.25), and 0.87 (0.78-0.97), respectively. Total meat consumption (0.97 [0.85-1.11]) and red meat consumption 0.87 (0.64-1.18) were not significantly associated with stroke-related death.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The relationship between meat intake and risk of stroke may differ by type of meat. Recommendations for replacing proportions of red and processed meats to white meat for the prevention of stroke may be considered in clinical practice. 3 Controlling for risk factors is needed to halt the increasing rates of stroke prevalence globally. 4 Among the risk factors for stroke, dietary habit is one of the modifiable and self‐manageable factors that should be a focus of public health intervention. Previous meta‐analyses show that increased fruit and vegetable consumption is associated with a decreased risk of stroke, 5 , 6 , 7 whereas high intake of red and processed meats is related to an increase in total stroke and ischemic stroke cases. 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 Despite a recent transition to a higher proportion of white meat (poultry) intake, consumption of red and processed meats still constitutes the largest proportion of overall meat consumption and has been increasing in the United States and other developed countries. 12 One of the major problems currently with the recommendations for dietary protein in North America is that there is no clear distinction of fat content between red meat and white meat and fish. 13 At present, evidence on the effects of meat consumption on risk of stroke accounting for nutritional properties of different types of meat is not entirely clear. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the association of consumption of different kinds of meat with incident stroke and stroke‐related death before establishing nutrition intervention strategies. Some methodological inconsistencies and issues limit previous meta‐analyses of red meat and processed meat consumption that have reported a positive association with risk of stroke. Existing meta‐analyses considered stroke mortality as fatal stroke incidence and combined the results, 8 , 10 , 11 synthesized both out‐of‐date 14 and most recent 15 results from the same cohort (ie, Health Professionals Follow‐Up Study) for analysis, 11 and performed subgroup analysis only by stroke subtypes. In addition, we considered only the most recent publication eligible for inclusion if the studies were based on the same cohort. Definition of the Types of Meat The types of meat were assessed and classified by the following definition: (1) total meat: red meat and processed meat; (2) red meat: unprocessed or fresh red meat; (3) processed meat: processed meat or processed red meat; and (4) white meat: poultry meat only (fish excluded). Definition of Stroke Incidence and Mortality We defined stroke incidence as the first occurrence of stroke and stroke mortality as death caused by stroke. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment Two authors (K.K. Takata 2013 32 China SMHS (Shanghai Men's Health Study) 5.5 61 483 Men (40–74 y) 2733 Total stroke‐related deaths Red meat 126 g/d vs 21.4 g/d White meat 22.3 g/d vs 11.9 g/d HS: 0.71 (0.43–1.20) IS: 1.22 (0.69–2.15) HS: 0.89 (0.56–1.40) IS: 0.92 (0.54–1.57) Age, total caloric intake, income, occupation, education, comorbidity index, physical activity level, total vegetable intake, total fruit intake, fish intake, red meat or poultry intake where appropriate, smoking history, consumption of alcohol 8. Takata 2013 32 China SWHS (Shanghai Women's Health Study) 11.2 74 941 Women (40–70 y) 4210 Total stroke‐related deaths Red meat 103.4 g/d vs 16.5 g/d White meat: 19.9 g/d vs 11.9 g/d HS: 0.57 (0.37–0.87) IS: 0.84 (0.55–1.28) HS: 1.20 (0.79–1.80) IS: 1.04 (0.69–1.56) Age, total caloric intake, income, occupation, education, comorbidity index, physical activity level, total vegetable intake, total fruit intake, fish intake, red meat or poultry intake where appropriate, smoking history, consumption of alcohol ATC indicates anatomic therapeutic chemical; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence intervals; HS, hemorrhagic stroke; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; IS, ischemic stroke; MI, myocardial infarction; RR, relative risk; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; TS, total stroke. In contrast to red and processed meats, white meat contains less heme iron and is high in polyunsaturated fat. A previous study showed that a diet consisting of polyunsaturated fats as the primary source of fatty acids can lower low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C). 47 Compared with no change or an increase in low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, the lowering of low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol was related to a decreased risk of stroke and coronary heart
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:partial_only:for=0+3p:against=0+0p | v55:multi_partial_one_side:lean=lean_partial:for:one_sided

More for · 2
2021 · cited by 68
BACKGROUND Dietary guidelines recommend limiting red meat intake because it is a major source of medium- and long-chain SFAs and is presumed to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Evidence of an association between unprocessed red meat intake and CVD is inconsistent. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to assess the association of unprocessed red meat, poultry, and processed meat intake with mortality and major CVD. METHODS The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) Study is a cohort of 134,297 individuals enrolled from 21 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Food intake was recorded using country-specific validated FFQs. The primary outcomes were total mortality and major CVD. HRs were estimated using multivariable Cox frailty models with random intercepts. RESULTS In the PURE study, during 9.5 y of follow-up, we recorded 7789 deaths and 6976 CVD events. Higher unprocessed red meat intake (≥250 g/wk vs. <50 g/wk) was not significantly associated with total mortality (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.85, 1.02; P-trend = 0.14) or major CVD (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.92, 1.11; P-trend = 0.72). Similarly, no association was observed between poultry intake and health outcomes. Higher intake of processed meat (≥150 g/wk vs. 0 g/wk) was associated with higher risk of total mortality (HR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.10; P-trend = 0.009) and major CVD (HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.98; P-trend = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS In a large multinational prospective study, we did not find significant associations between unprocessed red meat and poultry intake and mortality or major CVD. Conversely, a higher intake of processed meat was associated with a higher risk of mortality and major CVD.
2021 · cited by 25
Abstract According to previous cohort studies it is suggested that a high intake of poultry does not adversely affect cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize and analyze the association between dietary poultry intake and the risk for CVDs, coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and all-cause mortality (ACM). Twenty-four cohort studies were included, and the results showed a trivial inverse association for the highest vs. lowest intake category between poultry and ACM (risk ratio [RR] = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.93, 0.98; I2 = 5%). For all other outcomes no association was observed in the high vs. low intake meta-analysis. The results from the primary pooled data for each 100 g/d increase in poultry intake indicated no association for all outcomes. Further, the non-linear dose-response analysis showed some evidence for non-linearity between poultry consumption and risk for CVD and ACM. Additionally, substituting red and/or processed meat with poultry was inversely associated with the risk for ACM, CVDs, CHD and stroke. The certainty of evidence was rated as very low or low. This meta-analysis suggests that based upon the results from the substitution analyses poultry could be a healthier alternative to red and processed meat. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1975092
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 005 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt