trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Epistemic closure means that if a subject knows P and knows that P entails Q, they know Q
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Standard epistemological definitions confirm that epistemic closure is the principle that knowledge is closed under known logical entailment.

Evidence for · 2
cited by 0
Reference article covering this claim directly
See more details
How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by reference works, not journal abstracts.

More for · 1
cited by 0
Provides formal specifications of epistemic closure matching the claim.
Everything we examined (20)
  1. Wikipedia: Epistemic closurereferencesupports
  2. Wikipedia: Epistemic modal logicreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. Book: Dictionary of Scientific Principlesreferencesupportsnot shown: a book whose author and subject did not establish authority here
  4. Book: Reason and Rationalityreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  5. Book: Elementary Logicreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. Book: Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, Volume 2referencesupportsnot shown: a book whose author and subject did not establish authority here
  7. Book: Knowing and Checkingreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  8. Book: Skepticismreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  9. Book: Epistemology for the Rest of the Worldreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  10. Book: New Perspectives on Epistemic Closurereferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  11. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Epistemic Closurereferencesupports
  12. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Epistemic Contextualismreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  13. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Epistemic Logicreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  14. Wikisource: What Are Conspiracy Theories? A Definitional Approach to Their Correlates, Consequences, and Communicationreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  15. OpenAIRE: The Nexus Dual-Phase Law: A Unified Recursive Frameworkpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  16. OpenAIRE: Secrets Buried Alongside Jeffrey Epstein Foreverpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  17. OpenAIRE: The Mark1 Nexus: A Recursive System Treatisepeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  18. OpenAIRE: Recursive Harmonic Architecture and Nexus: A Universal Symbolic Logic Substrate for Emergence and Resolutionpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  19. OpenAIRE: The Recursive Harmonic Architecture of Reality: A Unified Field Theory of Information, Consciousness, and the Cosmospeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  20. OpenAIRE: Harmonic Genesis: The SHA Unfolding and the Recursive Nexus of Realitypeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 6305 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt