Electrodynamic inconsistencies with Galilean relativity led Einstein to special relativity
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against
Scholarly sources partially document the historical context and general tension in 19th-century physics leading to special relativity, but do not fully detail specific electrodynamic inconsistencies with Galilean relativity as the direct cause.
Motion is always relative to something. Is this thing a concrete body like the earth, is it an abstract space, or is it an imagined frame? Do the laws of physics depend on the choice of reference? Is there a choice for which the laws are simplest? Is this choice unique? Is there a physical cause for the choice made? These questions traverse the history of modern physics from Galileo to Einstein. The answers involved Galilean relativity, Newton’s absolute space, the purely relational concepts of Descartes, Leibniz, and Mach, and many forgotten uses of relativity principles in mechanics, optics, and electrodynamics―until the relativity theories of Poincaré, Einstein, Minkowski, and Laue radically redefined space and time to satisfy universal kinds of relativity. Accordingly, this book retraces the emergence of relativity principles in early modern mechanics, documents their constructive use in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century mechanics, optics, and electrodynamics, and gives a well-rooted account of the genesis of special and general relativity in the early twentieth century. As an exercise in long-term history, it demonstrates the connectivity of issues and approaches across several centuries, despite enormous changes in context and culture. As an account of the genesis of relativity theories, it brings unprecedented clarity and fullness by broadening the spectrum of resources on which the principal actors drew.
Abstract
The foregoing discussion should have made clear the state of tension in which physics found itself at the end of the 19th century. This was already felt by the young and bright Einstein. Shortly before his death he remembered his short but happy year (1895–1896) as a pupil of the school in the small city of Aarau (Switzerland), in whose liberal atmosphere the ‘saucy Swabian’ (according to a classmate) felt much more at home than in the authoritarian Gymnasium at Munich (Germany).
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.