trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Economic models discount the instantaneous utility of future periods
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against

Economic models conventionally apply intertemporal optimization frameworks utilizing instantaneous utility functions that discount future period utility over time.

Evidence for · 3
2005 · cited by 0
The aim of this paper is to formulate a linear multisector model related to the currently existing economic literature on endogenous growth. The authors provide sufficient and almost necessary conditions for the existence of optimal strategies in the proposed linear multisector models, within for following main assumptions: the time is continuous, consumption is limited to one commodity, the instantaneous utility is of the CES (Constant Elasticity of Substitution) type, and available technology allows a positive growth rate. The proposed model has a production side that is close to the original von Neumann growth model, in which commodities are produced out of each other, and Ramsey-like preferences are present in the sense that the optimal behaviour of a representative agent determines the saving behaviour of the system. The paper concentrates on inter-temporal rather an intra-temporal choices, assuming a simple consumption good. The usual isoelastic utility function is employed to clarify the main differences with the single commodity analysis. Therefore, the preferences of the representative agent are characterized by two parameters: the rate of time discount \(\rho\), and the constant elasticity of substitution (CES) \(\sigma>0\). The authors show the important role of the upper bound of the uniform over time rates of representation of the consumption good \(\Gamma\). In particular, if \(\Gamma>(\Gamma-\rho)/\sigma\), then an optimal strategy exists, whereas if \(\Gamma<(
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:for=2+1p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 2
2012 · cited by 0
[eng]In Chapter 2 we extend the heterogeneous discounting model introduced in Marín-Solano and Patxot (2012) to a stochastic environment. Our main contribution in this chapter is to derive the DPE providing time-consistent solution for both the discrete and continuous time case. For the continuous time problem we derive the DPE following the two different procedures described above: the formal limiting procedure and the variational approach. However, an important limitation of these approaches is that the DPE obtained is a functional equation with a nonlocal term. As a consequence, it becomes very complicated to find solutions, not only analytically, but also numerically. For this reason, we also derive a set of two coupled partial differential equations which allows us to compute (analytically or numerically) the solutions for different economic problems. In particular, we are interested in analyzing how time-inconsistent preferences with heterogeneous discounting modify the classical consumption and portfolio rules (Merton (1971)). The introduction of stochastic terminal time is also discussed. In Chapter 3, the results of Chapter 2 are extended in several ways. First, we consider that the decision maker is subject to a mortality risk. Within this context, we derive the optimal consumption, investment and life insurance rules for an agent whose concern about both the bequest left to her descendants and her wealth at retirement increases with time. To this end we depart from
cited by 0
an instantaneous utility function u ( c ) {\displaystyle u(c)} where c {\displaystyle c} denotes consumption and discounts the next period utility at A Bellman equation, named after Richard E. Bellman, is a technique in dynamic programming which breaks an optimization problem into a sequence of simpler subproblems, as Bellman's "principle of optimality" prescribes. It is a necessary condition for optimality. The "value" of a decision problem at a certain point in time is written in terms of the payoff from some initial choices and the "value" In the deterministic setting, other techniques besides dynamic programming can be used to tackle the above optimal control problem. However, the Bellman Equation is often the most convenient method of solving stochastic optimal control problems. For a specific example from economics, consider an infinitely-lived consumer with initial wealth endowment a 0 {\displaystyle {\color {Red}a_{0}}} at period 0 {\displaystyle 0} . They have an instantaneous utility function u ( c ) {\displaystyle u(c)} where c {\displaystyle c} denotes consumption and discounts the next period utility at a rate of 0 < β < 1 {\displaystyle 0<\beta <1} . Assume that what is not consumed in period t {\displaystyle t} carries over to the next period with interest rate r {\displaystyle r} . Then the consumer's utility maximization problem is to choose a consumption plan { c t } {\displaystyle \{{\color {OliveGreen}c_{t}}\}} that solves
Everything we examined (3)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Existence of optimal strategies in linear multisector modelspeer-reviewedno side taken
  2. Heterogeneous discounting. Time consistency in investment and insurance modelspeer-reviewedno side taken
  3. Bellman equationreferenceno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt