trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Dogs can detect cancer through smell
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
7 sources for · 0 against

Multiple studies, reviews, and clinical evaluations demonstrate that trained dogs can detect cancer through the smell of volatile organic compounds found in breath and urine samples with high sensitivity and specificity.

Evidence for · 7
2021 · cited by 2
Discusses the potential and high accuracy of trained dogs for non-invasive detection of cervical cancer biomarkers.
See more details
The analysis

The provided literature strongly supports the claim that dogs can detect cancer through smell. Multiple reviews, empirical evaluations, and meta-analyses (such as papers [0], [2], [5], [6], [7], [9], and [11]) consistently show that trained canines can identify cancer biomarkers in biological samples like breath and urine with high sensitivity and specificity. There are no papers refuting this capability.

More for · 6
2015 · cited by 0
Reviews past research demonstrating the ability of canines to differentiate between cancerous and healthy individuals through biological samples.
2023 · cited by 0
Provides a systematic review and meta-analysis estimating high pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for medical detection dogs identifying prostate cancer.
2015 · cited by 0
Reports that trained dogs can distinguish breath odor samples from lung and other cancer patients compared to healthy individuals at better-than-chance rates.
2026 · cited by 0
Notes that trained detection dogs demonstrate exceptional olfactory sensitivity in clinical studies for multi-cancer detection.
2023 · cited by 0
States that dogs and other animals have shown a high capacity to detect cancer odors with high success rates.
2019 · cited by 0
Demonstrates that trained Belgian Malinois dogs can identify prostate cancer from urine samples with high sensitivity and specificity.
Everything we examined (12)
  1. Canine Detection of the Volatile Organic Compounds Related to Cervical Cancer Cellspeer-reviewedsupports
  2. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography in acute ischemic stroke: A retrospective evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and time-dependent performancepeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. Canine olfaction and electronic nose detection of volatile organic compounds in the detection of cancer: a review.peer-reviewedsupports
  4. Ants detect cancer cells through volatile organic compounds.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  5. The scent of colorectal cancer: detection by volatile organic compound analysis.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. The Olfaction Ability of Medical Detection Canine to Detect Prostate Cancer From Urine Samples: Progress Captured in Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.peer-reviewedsupports
  7. Study of the art: canine olfaction used for cancer detection on the basis of breath odour. Perspectives and limitations.peer-reviewedsupports
  8. Digitized canine olfaction and multimodal biosensing for breath-based multi-cancer detection: a hypothesis-driven perspective.peer-reviewedsupports
  9. Non-invasive cancer detection in canine urine through Caenorhabditis elegans chemotaxis.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  10. Ability of animals to detect cancer odors.peer-reviewedsupports
  11. Influences of breath sample re-use on the accuracy of lung cancer detection dogs.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  12. [Prostate cancer and dogs sense of smell: opportunities of noninvasive diagnostics].peer-reviewedsupports
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7805 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt