trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Do-support applies in English wh-questions when the subject is not the questioned element
the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
no citation needed for this one
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
no sources on either side

The claim that do-support applies in English wh-questions when the subject is not the questioned element describes a standard, descriptive rule of English grammar (e.g., 'What did John see?' versus 'Who saw Mary?'), so no citation is needed.

See more details
The analysis

The claim states a basic descriptive rule of English syntax regarding subject/non-subject asymmetries in wh-questions and do-support. This is a foundational grammatical fact taught in introductory linguistics and grammar, representing common knowledge in the field that does not require empirical paper receipts.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9504 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt