trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Direct skin contact with wet concrete causes chemical burns and skin irritation.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Direct skin contact with wet concrete or cement can cause chemical burns and contact dermatitis due to its caustic and alkaline ingredients.

Evidence for · 2
Skin burns due to wet cement
1982 · cited by 19
Paper 3 documents clinical cases of serious skin burns resulting from prolonged contact with wet cement.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved literature includes clinical evidence of burns resulting from prolonged contact with wet cement (Paper 3) and documents that construction workers handling cement experience corrosive effects and irritant contact dermatitis (Paper 4). These sources directly support the claim.

More for · 1
Occupational skin problems in construction workers.
2010 · cited by 12
Paper 4 notes that construction workers handling cement face constituents capable of producing both irritant contact dermatitis and corrosive effects.
Everything we examined (12)
We also searched for evidence AGAINST this claim, not only for it.
  1. Irritant Contact Dermatitis - a Review.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  2. Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. State-of-the-Art of Eggshell Waste in Materials Science: Recent Advances in Catalysis, Pharmaceutical Applications, and Mechanochemistry.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  4. Skin burns due to wet cementpeer-reviewedsupports
  5. Occupational skin problems in construction workers.peer-reviewedsupports
  6. 9th Trends in Medical Mycology Held on 11-14 October 2019, Nice, France, Organized under the Auspices of EORTC-IDG and ECMM.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. Application of Inorganic Nanomaterials in Cultural Heritage Conservation, Risk of Toxicity, and Preventive Measures.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  8. Two decades of continuous progresses and breakthroughs in the field of bioactive ceramics and glasses driven by CICECO-hub scientists.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  9. Occupational burnspeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  10. Current Understanding of Sex Differences in Metal-Induced Diseases.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  11. Occupational Dermatoses.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  12. Efficacy of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus probiotic strains in treating chromate induced dermatitis.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7206 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt