trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Direct microscopic examination detects sample contamination in clinical bacteriology
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Peer-reviewed literature indicates that microscopic examination, such as staining and visual checks of media, is utilized to assess and detect bacterial contamination in samples.

Evidence for · 2
2005 · cited by 133
AbstractNamed after Hans Christian Gram who developed the method in 1884, the Gram stain allows one to distinguish between Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria on the basis of differential staining with a crystal violet‐iodine complex and a safranin counterstain. The cell walls of Gram‐positive organisms retain this complex after treatment with alcohol and appear purple, whereas gram‐negative organisms decolorize following such treatment and appear pink. The method described here is useful for assessing bacterial contamination of tissue culture samples or for examining the Gram stain status and morphological features of bacteria isolated from mixed or isolated bacterial cultures.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:for=2+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 1
cited by 0
Procedures involving lipid media for detection of bacterial contamination in breweries. The liquid equivalent of universal beer agar, designated universal beer liquid medium, and its beer-free equivalent, universal liquid medium (UL), were equally effective in demonstrating bacterial contamination in 120 of 200 samples from different stages of commercial brewing process. Growth of the contaminants after 3 days was consistently more luxuriant in the UL medium. A yeast-water substrate medium failed to reveal many contaminants detected with UL in 392 samples from three breweries and revealed only a few not detected with UL. The use of UL and a lactose-peptone medium, with microscope examination of the media for bacterial growth, permitted detection of 93% of the known contaminants compared to 87%, detected with UL alone; this combination or universal beer liquid medium plus lactose-peptone medium can therefore be recommended for the detection of bacterial contaminants in brewery samples. Bacterial contamination of pitching yeasts appeared to be a particular problem in the breweries investigated. Published in Applied and environmental microbiology (1977)
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Gram Stainingreferenceno side taken
  2. PubMed: Procedures involving lipid media for detection of bacterial contamination in breweries.peer-reviewedno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt