trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Different laboratories use varying reference ranges for thyroid antibodies

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Different laboratories and analytical assay platforms utilize varying reference limits and cutoffs for thyroid autoantibodies like TgAb and anti-TPO, meaning results cannot always be used interchangeably.

The analysis

The retrieved literature (specifically papers 1 and 7) directly supports the claim that thyroid antibody measurements exhibit high inter-method variability, significant differences in upper reference limits, and poor quantitative agreement across different commercial platforms and laboratories.

Evidence for · 2
Recorded source metadata

Federica D’Aurizio, P. Metus, Anna Ferrari, Benedetta Caruso, R. Castello, D. Villalta, A. Steffan, K. Gaspardo, F. Pesente, N. Bizzaro, E. Tonutti, S. Valverde, C. Cosma, Mario Plebani, R. Tozzoli. Definition of the upper reference limit for thyroglobulin antibodies according to the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry guidelines: comparison of eleven different automated methods. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13317-017-0096-3

Paper 1 demonstrates significant inter-method variability and wide variation in upper reference limits and cutoffs for thyroglobulin antibodies across multiple automated assay platforms and laboratories.

See more details
More for · 1
Recorded source metadata

I. Mănescu, A. Luca, A. Huțanu, Andreea Truța, M. Dobreanu. Anti-thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibodies – Comparative analysis of two automatic methods, ECLIA and CMIA. 2024. https://doi.org/10.2478/rrlm-2024-0009

Paper 7 confirms that different analytical methods for anti-thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibodies possess differing reference ranges and lack quantitative agreement, making them unsuitable for interchangeable monitoring.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked02 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8402 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt