trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Curie temperatures do not follow a simple periodic trend across ferromagnetic materials
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Retrieved evidence directly confirms that Curie temperatures do not follow a simple periodic trend across ferromagnetic materials.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
# Why doesn't curie temperature follow a periodic trend in ferromagnetic materials Tags: inorganic-chemistry, magnetism - Score: 15 - Views: 527 - Answers: 1 - Answered: yes - Asked by: getafix (8583 rep) - Asked: 2016-12-30 - Site: chemistry ## Question I was writing up an answer to a question which was asking why the Curie Temperature's of $\ce{Fe, Co, Ni}$ don't follow a periodic trend. The OP voluntarily deleted his question before I could finish and post my answer. The OP has reasoned as follows: Since Iron, Cobal and Nickel have electron configurations $\ce{[Ar] 3d^6 4s^2, [Ar] 3d^7 4s^2\ \text{and}\ [Ar] 3d^8 4s^2}$, giving them 4 , 3, and 2 unpaired electrons respectively. This according to the OP should suggest a periodicity in Curie Temperature's which isn't observed. Clearly this isn't the case. For your reference, the Curie temperatures for the three metals are (iron, cobalt, nickel): $1043\ \mathrm{K}, 1400\ \mathrm{K}, 627\ \mathrm{K}$ Since this did indicate some ignorance about the origins of magnetism, I decided to to write up a short answer, describing the salient features and at the same time correcting OP's misconception. The answer was kept relatively s
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Why doesn't curie temperature follow a periodic trend in ...referenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 001 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt