trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Cross-cutting relationships dictate that geologic features cutting across strata are younger than the rocks they cut.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Reference documentation and geological guides confirm that the principle of cross-cutting relationships establishes that any geologic feature cutting across strata or rock structures is younger than the rocks it cuts.

Evidence for · 2
cited by 0
Cross-cutting relationships Cross-cutting relationships can be used to determine the relative ages of rock strata and other structures. Explanations: A – folded rock strata cut by a thrust fault; B – large intrusion(cutting through A); C – erosional angular unconformity(cutting off A & B) on which rock strata were deposited; D – volcanic dike(cutting through A, B & C); E – even younger rock strata (overlying C & D); F – normal fault(cutting through A, B, C & possibly E). Cross-cutting relationships is a principle of geology that states that the geologic feature which cuts another is the younger of the two features. It is a relative dating technique in geology. It was first developed by Danish geological pioneer Nicholas Steno in Dissertationis prodromus (1669) and later formulated by James Hutton in Theory of the Earth(1795) and embellished upon by Charles Lyell in Principles of Geology(1830). ## Types There are several basic types of cross-cutting relationships: - Structural relationships may be faults or fractures cutting through an older rock. - Intrusional relationships occur when an igneous pluton or dike is intruded into pre-existing rocks. - Stratigraphic relationships
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:for=2+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 1
cited by 0
Fossils, Rocks, and Time: The Laws of Superposition and Cross-Cutting Relations ## THE LAWS OF SUPERPOSITION AND CROSS-CUTTING RELATIONS The basalt flow shown here obeys the Law of Superposition. It is younger than the beds below it and older than the beds above it. Note that the molten rock of the volcanic flow has baked the rock underneath it. The bed above was deposited long after the flow had cooled and hardened and has not been baked. Numeric ages from the flow and dike and relative ages from the fossils in the surrounding rocks contribute to the geologic time scale. | The granite dike (a mass of rock that cuts across the structure of the rocks around it) shown here illustrates the Law of Cross-Cutting Relations. The dike is younger than all the rocks that it cuts across and older than the rocks above it that it does not cut. Note that the contact between the dike and the rocks around it has been baked by the heat of the molten granite. | | --- | Return to The Numeric Time Scale --- This page is URL: https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/fossils/laws.html Last updated 26 June 1997 (krw) Maintained by John Watson
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Cross-cutting relationshipsreferenceno side taken
  2. Fossils, Rocks, and Time: The Laws of Superposition and Cross-Cutting Relationsreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt