trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Corresponding authorship carries specific implied responsibilities and academic meanings
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Corresponding authorship carries explicit administrative, ethical, and academic responsibilities, such as verifying author lists, managing ethical approvals, and ensuring accurate citations.

Evidence for · 2
2021 · cited by 22
This paper highlights the specific status and responsibilities associated with co-corresponding authorship within shared credit frameworks.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved literature clearly indicates that corresponding authorship entails distinct responsibilities, including managing ethical approvals, declaring competing interests, verifying author lists, and communicating with journals. Papers [1] and [5] directly support this by examining co-corresponding authorship status and delineating the specific duties of the corresponding author.

More for · 1
2018 · cited by 1
This paper explicitly outlines the formal regulatory obligations and ethical responsibilities that the corresponding author assumes, such as handling author lists, ethics approvals, and trial registrations.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8404 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt