trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Consuming honey helps prevent gingivitis, periodontal disease, and dental caries.
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Peer-reviewed literature notes that honey exhibits antibacterial properties against oral pathogens associated with gingivitis and dental caries in laboratory and in-vitro settings, but clinical evidence regarding its preventive efficacy remains inconclusive.

Evidence for · 2
2022 · cited by 20
The successful application of honey in wound care management has been achieved due to honey's potent antibacterial effects, characterised by its multifactorial action. Impressive clinical efficacy has ignited its further use in diverse clinical disciplines, including stomatology. Indeed, there is increasing usage of honey in dental medicine as a preventive or therapeutic remedy for some periodontal diseases mainly associated with bacteria, such as dental caries, gingivitis and mucositides. Dental caries is undoubtedly a major oral health problem worldwide, with an increasing tendency of incidence. The purpose of this perspective review is to describe the recent progress in the laboratory and clinical use of honey in the prevention of dental caries, with emphasis on the antibacterial and antibiofilm effects of honey. The role of honey in the cariogenic process is also discussed. In addition, the quality of honey and the urgent in vitro evaluation of its antibacterial/antibiofilm properties before clinical use are highlighted. Findings based on data extracted from laboratory studies demonstrate the pronounced antibacterial effect of different honeys against a number of periodontal pathogens, including <i>Streptococcus mutans</i>. Although the promising antibiofilm effects of honey have been reported mainly against <i>S. mutans</i>, these results are limited to very few studies. From a clinical point of view, honey significantly reduces dental plaque; however, it is not superior to the conventional agent. Despite the positive in vitro results, the clinical effectiveness of honey in the prevention of dental caries remains inconclusive since further robust clinical studies are needed. Indeed, there is increasing usage of honey in dental medicine as a preventive or therapeutic remedy for some periodontal diseases mainly associated with bacteria, such as dental caries, gingivitis and mucositides. Dental caries is undoubtedly a major oral health problem worldwide, with an increasing tendency of incidence. The purpose of this perspective review is to describe the recent progress in the laboratory and clinical use of honey in the prevention of dental caries, with emphasis on the antibacterial and antibiofilm effects of honey. The role of honey in the cariogenic process is also discussed. Despite the positive in vitro results, the clinical effectiveness of honey in the prevention of dental caries remains inconclusive since further robust clinical studies are needed. Keywords: honey, antibacterial, quality, dental medicine, S. mutans status released display-pdf yes is-olf no is-manuscript no is-preprint no is-journal-matter no is-scanned no is-retracted no Received 2022 Aug 9; Accepted 2022 Sep 1; Collection date 2022 Sep. 1. Introduction Dental caries is considered to be a global health priority in the treatment of oral diseases. According to the Global Burden of Disease 2015 study, 3.5 billion people worldwide had dental conditions, predominantly untreated dental caries [ 1 ]. Overall, the global burden of untreated dental caries for primary and permanent dentition has remained relatively unchanged over the past 30 years [ 2 ]. Dental caries is the localised destruction of susceptible dental hard tissues (enamel and dentine) by weak organic acidic by-products from the bacterial fermentation of dietary carbohydrates (sucrose) [ 3 ]. A very recent epidemiological study showed that the global number of cases of caries of permanent teeth increased by 46.1% (95% uncertainty interval, 42.0% to 50.3%) from 1990 to 2019 [ 9 ]. The fast increase in the dental caries burden suggests the need to re-evaluate the current insurance scheme and strengthen efforts to prevent caries. It has recently been suggested that dental caries prevention and management is about controlling risk factors to maintain a balanced intraoral biofilm ecology that guards against a continuing low pH [ 10 ]. Based on current knowledge, the authors classified dental caries as a non-communicable disease. 3.2. Antibiofilm Effect of Honey against Oral Pathogens Dental biofilms play a vital role in caries initiation and development. Therefore, the prevention and/or eradication of dental plaque biofilm is an important approach in the management of dental caries. There are several strategies for inhibiting the formation of cariogenic bacterial biofilms as well as for disrupting already-formed biofilm [ 59 ]. From practical and economic points of view, the prevention of plaque biofilm formation is a key step in maintaining good oral health. Several types of polyphenols have antimicrobial properties and can inhibit bacterial growth, adherence and biofilm formation (reviewed in [ 76 ]). Data from clinical studies show In contrast, rinsing with 10% sucrose solution for 1 min caused a decrease in pH value to below 5.5. In addition, bacterial counts were significantly reduced only in the honey group compared to the other treatment groups. The dental plaque score in 56 subjects who used a 5% honey solution as a mouthwash for a period of 6 days was determined by Alibasyah et al. (2018) [ 86 ]. A significant difference between dental plaque score before and after 6 days of using honey solution was found. Honey is often used as a mouthwash in the clinical testing of the treatment of periodontal diseases [ 89 ]. Therefore, the quality of honey and its antibacterial and antibiofilm activity need to be determined before pre-clinical and clinical trials are conducted. The antibacterial, and particularly antibiofilm, effect of honey is an important factor in determining honey’s clinical efficacy in the prevention of dental caries through the eradication of viable bacteria within dental plaque biofilm. We argue that the information presented in this perspective review will stimulate further clinical research on honey in periodontal diseases where its antibacterial/antibiofilm as well as anti-inflammatory and wound healing activities will be employed.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:partial_only:for=0+2p:against=0+0p | v55:multi_partial_one_side:lean=lean_partial:for:one_sided

More for · 1
2025 · cited by 2
<h4>Purpose</h4>To investigate the antibacterial and anti-biofilm effects of two Manuka honey toothpaste formulations containing propolis (Manuka prop) or fluoride (Manuka F), in comparison with the toothpaste base (TP con) and a commercial toothpaste (TP com), on oral bacteria and biofilm.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the formulations and controls were tested against five oral bacterial species. Both the effect on a multispecies dental biofilm precultured for 3.5 days as well as the inhibition of de-novo biofilm formation up to 24 h were investigated. Test substances at concentrations of 20%, 10% and 5% were applied to preformed biofilm for 1 min. The reduction in colony-forming units (cfu), metabolic activity, and biofilm mass were determined. Similarly, the test substances were applied to surfaces for 30 min before bacteria and media were added. The reduction of a tetrazolium dye (MTT assay) was used to assess cytotoxicity on gingival fibroblasts.<h4>Results</h4>The MIC values of all toothpaste formulations including TP con were very low with the highest MIC of 0.04%. In precultured biofilms, both the number of colony forming units (cfu) and metabolic activity decreased following addition of any toothpaste. The greatest reductions of cfu were found after addition of 20% TP com (by about 6 log10) and after 20% Manuka prop (by about 2.3 log10). However, the biofilm mass was not reduced. Coating the surface with toothpaste formulation, the cfu in the newly formed biofilm decreased in a concentration-dependent manner, with TP com being most active. Both 20% of Manuka prop and Manuka F reduced the cfu counts more than the TP con at 24 h. The toothpaste formulations affected the viability of gingival fibroblasts in a concentration-dependent manner, with no differences observed among the formulations.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The Manuka-honey containing toothpastes might be an alternative to toothpaste containing conventional chemi pmc Oral Health Prev Dent Oral Health Prev Dent 4642 ohpd OHPD Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry 1602-1622 1757-9996 Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc PMC11966148 PMC11966148.1 11966148 11966148 40146163 10.3290/j.ohpd.c_1910 3290 1 Oral Medicine In-Vitro Effect of Manuka Honey / Propolis Toothpastes on Bacteria and Biofilm Associated with Caries and Gingivitis Jungbauer Gert a Lechner Raphaela b Stähli Alexandra c Sculean Anton d Eick Sigrun e a Gert Jungbauer Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland and Dental practice, Straubing, Germany. Conclusion The Manuka-honey containing toothpastes might be an alternative to toothpaste containing conventional chemical agents. Further research is needed to clinically examine the effect on caries and gingivitis prevention. Bacteria in a biofilm increase their resistance to antibacterial agents about 1000x compared to planktonic, free-floating bacteria by the production of an extracellular matrix and cell-to-cell interactions. 1 , 7 , 10 After 24 h, oral bacteria form a stable biofilm that evades chemical plaque control, and mechanical disintegration is needed to prevent further biofilm maturation and plaque-induced oral diseases, like caries and gingivitis. 52 Therefore, home oral hygiene is recommended twice a day for at least two minutes using either a manual or electric toothbrush, as well as interdental cleaning devices. 30 Clinically, propolis was able to reduce bacteria associated with periodontal disease in periodontitis patients after a 3-month follow-up. 17 In another study, propolis decreased Streptococcus mutans and further oral bacterial species after a 4 week period. 31 Manuka honey is a monofloral honey produced by European honeybees ( Apis mellifera ) from the nectar of the Manuka tree, Leptospermum scoparium , and shows strong antibacterial activity. 47 In contrast to non-Manuka honeys, the antibacterial property of Manuka honey is attributed to leptosperin, and predominantly to methylglyoxal (MGO). Streptococci were cultured with 10% CO 2 , whereas agar plates with the other strains were incubated in an anaerobic chamber with the respective atmosphere (85% N 2 , 10% H 2 and 5% CO 2 ). Before use in the assays, the strains were suspended in 0.9% w/v NaCl according to McFarland 1.0. Determination of Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations In the first part of the study, the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the test substances and the controls were determined against five bacterial strains that are commensals ( S. gordonii ATCC 10558) or associated with caries ( S. mutans ATCC 25175) or periodontal diseases ( F. nucleatum ATCC 25586, T. forsythia ATCC 43300, P. 28 , 37 The supplementation of the TP con with Manuka honey/fluoride or Manuka honey/propolis further increased the anti-biofilm Regarding the natural products propolis and Manuka honey, their safety profiles are positive for long-term use. 2 , 45 However it should be noted that contact allergies to propolis might occur. 29 Nevertheless, it remains to be noted that aside from toothpaste, the mechanical disintegration of the biofilm is a conditio sine qua non. To remove the dental biofilm, an appropriate toothbrush together with an adequate brushing technique should be applied. 43 Conclusion Toothpaste formulations containing Manuka honey/propolis or Manuka honey/fluoride may represent a natural alternative to commercially available products containing chemical detergents with regard to antibacterial properties and cytotoxicity. Natural ingredients like Manuka and propolis may contribute to biofilm management at home and therefore to the prevention of caries and gingivitis. However, the obtained in-vitro results need to be confirmed in clinical studies. The concentrations of Manuka honey and propolis used in this study may be somewhat low. A higher antibacterial effect could likely be achieved by increasing the concentrations of these natural products.
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effect of Honey in the Prevention of Dental Caries: A Recent Perspective.peer-reviewedno side taken
  2. In-Vitro Effect of Manuka Honey / Propolis Toothpastes on Bacteria and Biofilm Associated with Caries and Gingivitis.peer-reviewedno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt