trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Consumer theory assumes that utility functions are consistent over time
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
confidence 14/100

Consumer theory's assumption of consistent utility functions over time is challenged by empirical evidence showing that human intertemporal choices and preferences fluctuate due to emotions, motor dynamics, and contextual inconsistencies.

Evidence against · 2
Does sadness bring myopia: an intertemporal choice experiment with college students.
2024 · cited by 4
Paper [0] demonstrates that individuals' intertemporal choices and preferences for rewards are inconsistent and influenced by emotional states like sadness, challenging rigid consistency assumptions.
See more details
More against · 1
The Trembling Hand Unraveled: Motor Dynamics and Choice Inconsistency.
2025 · cited by 0
Paper [9] provides extensive evidence that humans are inherently inconsistent in their economic and risky choices.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1401 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt