Conjugate gaze is the proper term for the synchronization of eye movements

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Conjugate gaze or conjugate eye movement is established by medical and physiological reference sources as the proper term for the coordinated, synchronized movement of both eyes in the same direction.

How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by reference works, not journal abstracts.

Evidence for · 3

en.wikipedia.org: Conjugate eye movement

Recorded source metadata

en.wikipedia.org: Conjugate eye movement. en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjugate_eye_movement

Defines conjugate eye movement as motor coordination allowing bilateral fixation.

Source citation format

See more details

More for · 2

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: Chapter 60 Cranial Nerves III, IV, and VI: The Oculomotor, Trochlear, and Abducens Nerves

Recorded source metadata

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: Chapter 60 Cranial Nerves III, IV, and VI: The Oculomotor, Trochlear, and Abducens Nerves. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK406/

Defines conjugate gaze as the movement of both eyes in the same direction.

Source citation format

en.wikipedia.org: Gaze (physiology)

Recorded source metadata

en.wikipedia.org: Gaze (physiology). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjugate_gaze

Indicates that conjugate gaze redirects to physiological gaze coordination.

Source citation format

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked01 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 7501 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt