trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Confirmation bias causes humans to only process information they want to hear

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Evidence strongly supports the presence of confirmation bias and motivated reasoning, which lead individuals to selectively process information aligned with their existing beliefs, although certain conditions like information utility can occasionally override this tendency.

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently demonstrate that humans exhibit confirmation bias and motivated reasoning, selectively exposing themselves to and processing information that aligns with pre-existing beliefs or desires. While factors like information utility or high cognitive engagement can sometimes moderate these effects, no paper refutes the general phenomenon that confirmation bias shapes information processing. Therefore, the claim is supported.

Evidence for · 4
Recorded source metadata

Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, Cornelia Mothes, Nick Polavin. Confirmation Bias, Ingroup Bias, and Negativity Bias in Selective Exposure to Political Information. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217719596

The study demonstrates confirmation bias in selective exposure to political information.

See more details
More for · 3
Recorded source metadata

Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, Steven B. Kleinman. Preelection Selective Exposure. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211400597

Results confirm that confirmation bias drives selective exposure, though it can be overridden under certain conditions.

Recorded source metadata

Benoît Béchard, J. Kimmerle, J. Lawarée, Pierre-Olivier Bédard, Sharon E. Straus, Mathieu Ouimet. The Impact of Information Presentation and Cognitive Dissonance on Processing Systematic Review Summaries: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Bicycle Helmet Legislation. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106234

The research shows that motivated reasoning and cognitive dissonance interfere with how readers process information.

Recorded source metadata

Clark CJ, Kerry N, Graso M, Tetlock PE. Morally offensive scientific findings activate cognitive chicanery.. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.70035

Experiments show that people use various belief-system defenses and cognitive strategies to neutralize disturbing or unwanted knowledge claims.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 9001 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt