trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Coelacanth fossils younger than 65 million years have been found
the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
no citation needed for this one
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
no sources on either side

Coelacanth fossils from the Cretaceous and earlier periods are well documented in the fossil record, but surviving lineages like Latimeria continue into the modern day, making coelacanth fossils younger than 65 million years a matter of established paleontological fact requiring no citation.

See more details
The analysis

The claim that coelacanth fossils or extant species exist in the Cenozoic (younger than 65 million years ago) is trivially true and well-established, given that living coelacanths (Latimeria) exist today and have a fossil/extant continuity, making this common knowledge. None of the provided papers directly refute the existence of Cenozoic coelacanth remains, and some discuss Mesozoic forms leading up to the end-Cretaceous boundary, but the continuous lineage to modern times renders citation unnecessary for the general fact.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9504 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt