CMIP6 model outputs for relative humidity exceed standard 1-100% scale limits
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against
The retrieved evidence mentions comparisons and processing of relative humidity model outputs within climate datasets like CMIP6, but does not provide evidence indicating whether these outputs exceed standard 1-100% scale limits.
<p>Stochastic comparison of climate model outputs to observed relative humidity fields</p><p>We compare the stochastic behaviour of relative humidity outputs of climate models for the 20<sup>th</sup> century to the historical data (stations and reanalysis fields) at several temporal and spatial scales. In particular we examine the marginal distributions and the dependence structure with emphasis on the Hurst-Kolmogorov behaviour. The comparison aims to contribute to the quantification of reliability and predictive uncertainty of relative humidity climate model outputs over different scales in a framework of assessing their relevance for engineering planning and design.</p><p> </p><p>(Acknowledgement: This research is conducted within the frame of the course "Stochastic Methods" of the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA). The School of Civil Engineering of NTUA provided moral support for the participation of the students in the Assembly.)</p>