trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Clothing colors appear different in stores due to store lighting conditions.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Clothing and object colors appear different under varying illumination, as supported by studies confirming that changes in light sources significantly alter perceived color appearance.

Evidence for · 2
2022 · cited by 4
Demonstrates that the appearance of color samples shifts due to illuminant changes across different lighting conditions.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved papers include studies showing that color appearance shifts under different illuminants (paper [3]) and that various store or display lamps significantly affect the color appearance evaluation of products (paper [6]). These findings directly support the claim that clothing colors appear different due to store lighting conditions. No papers refute this claim.

More for · 1
2024 · cited by 1
Shows that different types of display lamps and light sources have a significant effect on color appearance evaluation.
Everything we examined (12)
We also searched for evidence AGAINST this claim, not only for it.
  1. Adsorption, Antibacterial and Antioxidant Properties of Tannic Acid on Silk Fiber.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  2. Wool Fabrics Coated with an Anionic Bunte Salt-Terminated Polyether: Physicomechanical Properties, Stain Resistance, and Dyeability.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. Surface Modification of Polyester Fabrics by Ozone and Its Effect on Coloration Using Disperse Dyes.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  4. Invariant categorical color regions across illuminant change coincide with focal colorspeer-reviewedsupports
  5. Pixel-Wise Color Constancy via Smoothness Techniques in Multi-Illuminant Scenespeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. Optimizing the Potential Utility of Blue-Blocking Glasses for Sleep and Circadian Health.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. The Impact of the Fresh Pork Display Lamps on the Sensory Response of Consumers to Fresh Pork.peer-reviewedsupports
  8. The effect of weighting on the color appearance of dyed silk fabricpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  9. A hybrid color emotional experience approach: Integrating the pleasure-arousal-dominance model with fuzzy grey relational analysis.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  10. Can your eyes taste freshness? The role of visual realism, motion cues, and spatial imagery ability in juice packaging.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  11. A smart community interactive art therapy platform based on multimodal computer graphics and resilient artificial intelligence for home-based elderly care.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  12. A Robust Framework for Coffee Bean Package Label Recognition: Integrating Image Enhancement with Vision-Language OCR Models.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 6806 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt