Certain historical cultures used no personal names
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 1 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
Retrieved anthropological references indicate that personal names are a human universal and anthropologists have not found any society that entirely lacks personal names.
# Which culture used no personal names?
Tags: cultural-history, names
- Score: 73
- Views: 16597
- Answers: 2
- Answered: yes
- Asked by: csirmazbendeguz (833 rep)
- Asked: 2019-10-07
- Edited: 2019-10-08
- Site: history
## Question
The blog post Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Names – With Examples claims that:
There was an isolated culture in which
no one had names – they referred to everyone in relative terms, such
as “my mother’s eldest sister”.
Is this true? Which culture is the author talking about?
## Answers
### Answer by Lars Bosteen (score: 106 [ACCEPTED])
This would seem to be a piece of folklore.
Anthropologists have not found a single society which does not use
personal names in some form; they are a human universal. However, the
forms that these names take and the ways in which they are bestowed
and used vary between cultures.
Source: Abstract from Ellen S. Bramwell, 'Personal Names and Anthropology'. In Carole Hough (ed.), 'The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming' (2016)
William Bright (1928-2006), formerly a linguist at the University of California and then at the University of Colorado, also covered this in a 2003 article What IS a Name? Ref