trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Broiler chickens are injected with hormones in their left legs

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

The claim that broiler chickens are injected with hormones in their left legs is a persistent myth. Hormones are not used in poultry production, making the premise of such injections false.

How claims like this are judged

Judged against fact-checker rulings and reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the fact-checking record, not journal abstracts.

Evidence against · 2
Recorded source metadata

skeptics.stackexchange.com: Are broiler chickens injected with hormones in their left legs?. skeptics.stackexchange.com. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/49924/are-broiler-chickens-injected-with-hormones-in-their-left-legs

Identifies the claim that left legs are injected with hormones as a myth and rumor source.

See more details
More against · 1
Recorded source metadata

sciencedirect.com: Making things clear: Science-based reasons that chickens are not fed growth hormones - ScienceDirect. sciencedirect.com. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924224415300819

Explains that the use of growth hormones in poultry meat production is a myth.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1031 Jul 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt