trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Borax functions effectively as a primary standard in acid-base titrations
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Reference material confirms that borax functions effectively as a useful primary standard for titrating against acids.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
# Why is Borax used as a primary standard? Tags: inorganic-chemistry, titration - Score: 12 - Views: 6312 - Answers: 1 - Answered: yes - Asked by: Aditya Dev (7922 rep) - Asked: 2016-01-03 - Edited: 2016-03-21 - Site: chemistry ## Question It's given in my book that borax is a useful primary standard for titrating against acids. I have heard that primary standard is a pure reagent and does not gain any weight by absorbing moisture. (Hence any error during weight measurement is prevented). I got this from a website that came first on searching "primary standard" Primary standard is a reagent that is extremely pure, stable, has no waters of hydration, and has a high molecular weight . But borax (represented as $\ce{Na2B4O7.10H2O}$) has water of hydration. ## Answers ### Answer by A.K. (score: 13 [ACCEPTED]) Yes borax is a hydrate, but the reason it is favored for titration is that it gives consistent results, which to most scientists, is far more important than accuracy. The $\ce{ .\!10H2O}$ hydration number will remain constant and will not fluctuate to $\mathrm{11}$ or $\mathrm{9}$ within normal temperature and humidity ranges. This means that per mass the same amoun
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Why is Borax used as a primary standard?referenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9501 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt