Blood pressure is significantly higher in the aorta than in the brachial artery
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 3 against
Peer-reviewed literature demonstrates that systolic blood pressure is actually higher in the brachial artery than in the aorta due to pressure amplification.
Due to systolic blood pressure (SBP) amplification, brachial SBP may not accurately reflect central SBP, the pressure the organs are exposed to. Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have vascular irregularities that may affect blood pressure (BP) amplification and central BP indices (i.e. augmentation index [AIx] and augmentation pressure [AP]). By systematic review and meta-analysis, this study aimed firstly to determine the magnitude of central-to-brachial SBP and pulse pressure (PP) amplification in T2D compared to healthy controls and secondly, the difference in AIx and AP between the groups. Online databases were searched for published studies reporting invasive or non-invasive central and brachial SBP in T2D and healthy controls up to the 20th of February 2018. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were used to analyze the studies. Eighteen studies (all non-invasive: 17 radial tonometry, 1 carotid tonometry, 2 brachial oscillometry) with a total of 2758 patients with T2D and 10,561 healthy controls were identified. There was no significant difference in SBP amplification between groups (T2D = 9.9 ± 4.7, healthy controls = 9.6 ± 4.5 mmHg, p = 0.84; pooled difference = 0.64 mmHg, 95%CI -0.27 1.54, p = 0.17) or PP amplification ratio (p = 0.16). However, among these studies, central BP indices (AIx corrected for heart rate and AP) were significantly higher in T2D (p < 0.05 for both). Despite a similar magnitude of central-to-brachial SBP amplification, patients with T2D have increased central systolic loading (AIx and AP) that cannot be discerned from brachial BP alone.
In recent decades, some observational studies suggest that peripheral BP measured by brachial artery may not necessarily represent BP measured in the aortic artery which is known as central BP .In addition, some clinical trials also revealed that despite with comparable peripheral BP, patients with high central BP had significantly higher cardiovascular risk compared with those with low central BP indicating that central BP might be an independent predictor for CVD
A systematic review of invasive, high-fidelity pressure studies documenting the amplification of blood pressure from the aorta to the brachial and radial arteries
## Abstract
It is commonly accepted that systolic blood pressure (SBP) is significantly higher in the brachial/radial artery than in the aorta while mean (MBP) and diastolic (DBP) pressures remain unchanged. This may have implications for outcome studies and for non-invasive devices calibration. We performed a systematic review of invasive high-fidelity pressure studies documenting BP in the aorta and brachial/radial artery. We selected articles published prior to July 2015. Pressure amplification (Amp = peripheral minus central pressure) was calculated (weighted mean). The six studies retained (n = 294, 76.5% male, mean age 63.5 years) mainly involved patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). In two studies at the aortic/brachial level (n = 64), MBP and DBP were unchanged (MPAmp = 0.1 mmHg, DPAmp = -1.3 mmHg), while SBP increased (SPAmp = 4.2 mmHg; relative amplification = 3.1%). In four studies in which MBP was not documented (n = 230), brachial DBP remained unchanged and SBP increased (SPAmp = 6.6 mmHg;
Everything we examined (3)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.