trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Black holes contain actual gravitational singularities at their centers
the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - evenly split
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
4 sources for · 1 against

Reference literature indicates that black holes contain gravitational singularities at their centers under classical general relativity, while quantum gravity studies suggest that singularities may be resolved or removed.

Evidence for · 4
2019 · cited by 10
We present an implementation of a ray tracing code in the Schwarzschild metric. We aim at building a numerical code with a correct implementation of both special (aberration, amplification and Doppler) and general (deflection of light, lensing and gravitational redshift) relativistic effects so as to simulate what an observer with arbitrary velocity would see near, or possibly within, the black hole. We also pay some specific attention to perform a satisfactory rendering of stars. Using this code, we then show several unexplored features of the maximal analytical extension of the metric. In particular, we study the aspect of the second asymptotic region of the metric as seen by an observer crossing the horizon. We also address several aspects related to the white hole region (i.e. past singularity) seen both from outside the black hole, inside the future horizon and inside the past horizon, which gives rise to the most counter-intuitive effects.
Evidence against · 1
cited by 0
A black hole mass threshold from non-singular quantum gravitational collapse Quantum gravity is expected to remove the classical singularity that arises as the end-state of gravitational collapse. To investigate this, we work with a toy model of a collapsing homogeneous scalar field. We show that non-perturbative semi-classical effects of Loop Quantum Gravity cause a bounce and remove the black hole singularity. Furthermore, we find a critical threshold scale, below which no horizon forms -- quantum gravity may exclude very small astrophysical black holes. Published as: Phys.Rev.Lett. 95 (2005) 091302 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.091302 arXiv categories: gr-qc astro-ph hep-th
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+2p:against=0+1p:partial_opposition=1 | v55:sufficiency | v55:coherence_repaired:what=both

More for · 3
2016 · cited by 8
Using the WKB method, we show that the peak location ($r_{\rm peak}$) of the potential, which determines the quasinormal mode frequency of the Kerr black hole, obeys an accurate empirical relation as a function of the specific angular momentum $a$ and the gravitational mass $M$. If the quasinormal mode with $a/M \sim 1$ is observed by gravitational wave detectors, we can confirm the black-hole space-time around the event horizon, $r_{\rm peak}=r_+ +O(\sqrt{1-q})$ where $r_+$ is the event horizon radius. While if the quasinormal mode is different from that of general relativity, we are forced to seek the true theory of gravity and/or face to the existence of the naked singularity.
cited by 0
Gravitational singularity A gravitational singularity (sometimes called a spacetime singularity) is a term used to describe the center of a black hole where gravity is thought to approach infinity.[1] In the center of each black hole is a singularity, a point where infinite density develops as spacetime approaches it. Spacetime goes toward infinite curvature and matter is crushed to infinite density under the pull of infinite gravity. At a singularity, space and time cease to exist as we know them and current laws of physics cannot be applied to this region.[2] Singularities form by a collapse of a star, where star with high enough mass (above 30 times the sun) would shrink under its own gravity and force until it becomes a single, one dimensional point. When it forms, space and time would be infinite in there. An example would be that if a person were to stand on a collapsing star right before the singularity forms, and they sent a signal every second to a nearby observer, time and space would slow down as the singularity is being formed. The observer would hear the signal slowing down. Let's say the singularity forms at 12:00 exactly.
cited by 0
Due to quantum uncertainty, photons won’t actually orbit forever here, however they can still orbit for a long time. For rotating black holes, there are actually many photon spheres, depending on the angle that the photon is going relative to how the black hole is spinning. However, these paths are still unstable, with the exception of the one inside the black hole (which itself most likely would not actually exist due to the mass and energy falling in). Effect on light At the middle of a black hole, there is a gravitational center called a singularity. It is impossible to see into it because the gravity prevents any light escaping. Outside the event horizon, light and matter will still be pulled toward the black hole. If a black hole is surrounded by matter, the matter will form an "accretion disk" around the black hole. An accretion disk looks something like the rings of Saturn, but thicker, bigger, and way brighter. As it gets sucked in, the matter gets very hot and shoots x-ray radiation into space. Think of this as the water spinning around the hole before it falls in, getting vaporized by friction. Most black holes are too far away for us to see the accretion disk and jet.
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt