trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Black hole masses are determined by observing the orbital dynamics of surrounding matter.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
8 sources for · 0 against

Black hole masses are standardly determined by analyzing the orbital dynamics and kinematics of surrounding matter such as stars and gas.

Evidence for · 8
2017 · cited by 84
The paper discusses determining supermassive black hole masses using the virialized motion of gas in the vicinity of active black holes.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved papers overwhelmingly support the claim that black hole masses are determined by observing the orbital dynamics and kinematics of surrounding matter, including stellar dynamics, molecular gas kinematics, and gas emission line measurements.

More for · 7
2013 · cited by 81
The study demonstrates estimating black-hole masses by modeling the effect of a black hole on the kinematics of molecular gas.
2017 · cited by 41
The work presents an estimate of a supermassive black hole mass using three-dimensional molecular gas kinematics.
2010 · cited by 40
The study examines the orbit of stars around the Galactic Centre supermassive black hole as a dynamical probe.
2021 · cited by 20
The paper discusses estimating supermassive black hole masses dynamically using stellar and gas kinematic tracers.
2023 · cited by 13
The study uses stellar kinematics and dynamics to estimate the mass of the supermassive black hole in FCC 47.
2025 · cited by 8
The work presents mass measurements of a supermassive black hole using stellar absorption features to trace nuclear dynamics.
2019 · cited by 7
The paper discusses modeling the broad line region to constrain central black hole mass using dynamics.
Everything we examined (12)
  1. The effect of nuclear gas distribution on the mass determination of supermassive black holespeer-reviewedsupports
  2. A black-hole mass measurement from molecular gas kinematics in NGC4526peer-reviewedsupports
  3. Little red dots as young supermassive black holes in dense ionized cocoonspeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  4. Varying Constants, Gravitation and Cosmology.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  5. WISDOM project-I: black hole mass measurement using molecular gas kinematics in NGC 3665peer-reviewedsupports
  6. The Galactic Centre star S2 as a dynamical probe for intermediate-mass black holespeer-reviewedsupports
  7. Cross-checking SMBH mass estimates in NGC 6958 -- I: Stellar dynamics from adaptive optics-assisted MUSE observationspeer-reviewedsupports
  8. Effect of the initial mass function on the dynamical SMBH mass estimate in the nucleated early-type galaxy FCC47peer-reviewedsupports
  9. Supermassive black hole mass measurement in the spiral galaxy NGC 4736 using JWST/NIRSpec stellar kinematicspeer-reviewedsupports
  10. Time-Delay Cosmography: Measuring the Hubble Constant and Other Cosmological Parameters with Strong Gravitational Lensing.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  11. Modelling the AGN broad line region using single-epoch spectra – I. The test case of Arp 151peer-reviewedsupports
  12. Relativistic dynamics and extreme mass ratio inspirals.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8705 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt