trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Bilingual and multilingual native speakers make specific types of language production mistakes
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against

Linguistic research documents that bilingual and multilingual speakers experience phonological interference leading to specific speech production errors affecting articulation, stress patterns, and intonation.

Evidence for · 3
2019 · cited by 22
AbstractThe present study describes the results of two experiments that analyze the effects of language dominance on Catalan/Spanish bilingual speech production. We examined the acoustics of the Catalan [a]~[ə] alternation (a phonological process induced by lexical stress) and of the Catalan mid vowel contrasts /e/-/ɛ/ and /o/-/ɔ/ (two phonemic contrasts) in the speech of Catalan- vs. Spanish-dominant early Catalan/Spanish bilinguals from Majorca (Spain). The results indicate that, contrary to the analysis of the Catalan mid vowels, stressed and unstressed Spanish and Catalan /a/ yielded no significant difference as a function of language dominance. These findings suggest that unstressed vowel reduction, a phonological process, may be relatively easier to acquire than phonemic contrasts with a low functional load (/e/-/ɛ/, /o/-/ɔ/), perhaps because its predictability and high frequency may attract attention and/or relieve cognitive resources, which could be conducive to phonological learning. These findings demonstrate that language dominance effects in the production of phonemic contrasts, widely researched in the literature on early bilingualism, do not guarantee the same effects on the implementation of phonological processes.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+2p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 2
2015 · cited by 7
Introduction: The aim of this study is contribute to clinical practice of bilinguals around the globe, as well as to add to our understanding of bilingual aphasia processing, by analysing confrontation naming data from four Afrikaans/English bilingual individuals with acquired aphasia due to a left hemisphere stroke.Methods: This is a case series analysis of four Afrikaans/English bilingual aphasic individuals following a left cerebrovascular accident. Error analysis of confrontation naming data in both languages was performed. Research questions were directed toward the between language differences in lexical retrieval abilities, types of errors produced and degree of cognate overlap.Results: Three of the four participants showed significantly higher naming accuracy in first acquired language (L1) relative to the second acquired language (L2) and the largest proportion of error type for those three participants in both L1 and L2 was omission. One of the four participants (linguistically balanced) showed no between language accuracy difference. Regarding cognate overlap, there was a trend for higher accuracy for higher cognate words (compared to low).Discussion: This study showed that naming performance in these four individuals was reflective of their relative language proficiency and use patterns prior to their stroke. These findings are consistent with the hierarchical model, in normal bilingual speakers and with persons with bilingual aphasia.
2024 · cited by 0
This article deals with phonological interference, as a phenomenon when phonological rules or sounds of one language affect the pronunciation and sound system of another language, often found in bilingual or multilingual speakers. This type of interference can lead to changes in speech production affecting articulation, stress patterns, and intonation, which can create communication problems or misunderstandings between speakers of different languages. This can significantly affect the way bilingual speakers communicate in their second language, forcing them to apply phonetic rules from the first language. This can lead to errors or unusual stress patterns that can make them difficult for second-language speakers to understand. As a result, effective communication can be disrupted, especially if the interference is constant and noticeable. Phonological interference can manifest itself at various levels: segmental (individual sounds) and supersegmental (stress, intonation, rhythm of speech). At the segment level, this is expressed in the replacement or distortion of the sounds of the second language, which is especially noticeable in the presence of phonemes that are absent in the native language. At the supersegmental level, it manifests itself in a change in intonation constructions or the rhythmic pattern of speech, which can lead to difficulties in understanding. The study of phonological interference plays an important role in the field of linguistics and methods of teach
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt