Ballistic fingerprinting reliably matches bullets to specific handguns
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
confidence 85/100
Current forensic research and empirical testing demonstrate that ballistic fingerprinting and toolmark comparisons can reliably match fired cartridge cases to specific firearms with quantifiable and generally low error rates.
Evidence for · 5
Estimating error rates for firearm evidence identifications in forensic science
2017 · cited by 38
Paper [0] demonstrates that automated methods like congruent matching cells can effectively quantify topographic similarities on cartridge cases to estimate error rates.
See more details
More for · 4
Validity of forensic cartridge-case comparisons
2023 · cited by 23
Paper [1] establishes that firearm cartridge-case comparisons achieve uniformly low error rates.
A study of examiner accuracy in cartridge case comparisons. Part 1: Examiner error rates.
2023 · cited by 6
Paper [5] reports low empirical rates of false identifications and false eliminations among firearms examiners in a controlled study.
Three‐Dimensional Analysis of Cartridge Case Double‐Casts
2020 · cited by 5
Paper [7] shows that three-dimensional replication and analysis methods accurately preserve distinctive toolmark features for ballistic comparison.
Feature Extraction and Comparative Analysis of Firing Pin, Breech Face, and Annulus Impressions from Ballistic Cartridge Images
2025 · cited by 1
Paper [10] confirms the discriminative potential of quantitative geometric and texture features extracted from cartridge case impressions.