trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Axial bonds are longer than equatorial bonds in sp3d hybridized atoms
the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - the weight sits with the supporting side
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against

The retrieved literature notes that while traditional descriptions use sp3d hybridization to account for axial and equatorial bond differences, this model does not fully explain the differences.

Evidence for · 1
2001 · cited by 0
The pentacoordinated AB5-type main group molecules have long been thought to have sp3d hybridization of the central atom, accounting for their oxidation state and molecular geometry; however, this does not explain the difference in axial and equatorial bond distances within these molecules. In addition, d-orbital participation in bonding for nonmetals is energetically unfavorable because it requires a np → nd excitation energy. In this paper, we have proposed that the sp2 hybrid orbitals are formed on the central atom, overlapping with ligand orbitals in the equatorial positions. The longer axial bonds are formed via the overlap of the unhybridized p orbital on the central atom and the two terminal ligand orbitals, resulting in a three-center, four-electron bond. Examining the partial charge on the central atom using relevant electronegativity values supports this model without a d component in bonding. The model explains well the structure and bonding in pentavalent molecules. We believe that the results will be useful in updating chemistry texts.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency | v55:coherence_repaired:what=both

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Pentacoordinated AB5-Type Main Group Molecules Favorably Adopt sp2 Hybridization in the Central Atompeer-reviewedno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 004 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt