trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Avicenna and Aquinas define the agent intellect as the immaterial faculty that abstracts universal concepts.
the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - the weight sits with the supporting side
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Aquinas views the active intellect as immaterial and abstracting universals, while the sources link Avicenna to the separation of universal forms but do not fully document Avicenna's direct definition.

Evidence for · 2
Albert the Great
cited by 0
corresponds to a state of the soul in which the human agent intellect , which separates universal forms from matter ... usually seen as an effect of the influence that Arabic philosophers such as Alfarabi, Avicenna and Averroes ... ., 1991, “ The Contemplative Function of the Agent Intellect in the Psychology of Albert the Great,” in ...
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+1p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency | v55:coherence_repaired:what=both

More for · 1
Summa Theologiae/First Part/Question 79
cited by 0
it abstracts the universal , with respect to which things the universal is one. And this befits the active intellect inasmuch as it is immaterial . Reply
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Albert the Greatreferenceno side taken
  2. Summa Theologiae/First Part/Question 79referenceno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt