trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Astronauts qualify for hazardous duty pay during spaceflight missions
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Official regulations governing incentive pay for hazardous duty explicitly include spaceflights within the definition of aerial flight for qualifying personnel.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
Executive Orders | National Archives Skip to main content # Executive Orders Executive Order 11157--Prescribing regulations relating to incentive pay for hazardous duty, special pay for sea duty and duty at certain places, basic allowances for subsistence and basic allowances for quarters Source: The provisions of Executive Order 11157 of June 22, 1964, appear at 29 FR 7973, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 200, unless otherwise noted. By virtue of the authority vested in me by sections 301 (a) and (f), 305(a), 402(f), and 403(g) of title 37 of the United States Code and as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the armed forces of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows: Part I--Incentive Pay for Hazardous Duty Section 101. For the purposes of these regulations: (a) The term "aerial flight" shall be construed to mean flight in an aircraft, glider, or spacecraft; and a flight shall be deemed to begin when the aircraft, glider, or spacecraft takes off from rest at any point of support located on the surface of the earth and to terminate when it next comes to a complete stop at a point of support located on the surface of the earth. (b) The term "aviatio
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Executive Orders | National Archivesreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 001 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt