Anomalous color vision can be accurately tested using common computer screens

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Recent modeling and validation studies indicate that common computer screens can effectively and reliably be used for screening and assessing color vision deficiencies.

The analysis

Papers [4] and [8] provide direct empirical and modeling evidence supporting the claim that computer displays and computerized color assessments can accurately test color vision anomalies.

Evidence for · 2

Computerized Full-Color Assessment for Distinguishing Color Vision Deficiency

Recorded source metadata

Jin-Cherng Hsu, Chia-Ying Tsai, Chih-Hsuan Shih, Shao-Rong Huang, Hsing-Yu Wu, Yung-Shin Sun. Computerized Full-Color Assessment for Distinguishing Color Vision Deficiency. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15222837

Demonstrates that computerized assessment tools using specific color spectra can accurately diagnose color vision deficiency.

Source citation format

See more details

More for · 1

The D15 color arrangement test retains its diagnostic value regardless of display accuracy: A modeling study

Recorded source metadata

Tamás Árpádffy-Lovas, Edit Tóth-Molnár. The D15 color arrangement test retains its diagnostic value regardless of display accuracy: A modeling study. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.15.24314633

Shows via modeling that standard computer displays retain high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for color vision testing even with limited color accuracy.

Source citation format

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked02 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 7702 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt