Trust Me Bro: the receipt

trustme.bro/r/…

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

Analog Hawking radiation can be observed in condensed matter systems.

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

confidence 87/100

Multiple theoretical frameworks and recent quantum processor and fluid experiments demonstrate that analog Hawking radiation can be successfully simulated and observed in condensed matter and table-top systems.

Evidence for · 4

Analog Hawking radiation from an acoustic black hole in a flowing polariton superfluid

2012 · cited by 78

Paper [0] theoretically demonstrates signatures of analog Hawking radiation in flowing polariton superfluids.

citation format

See more details

More for · 3

Understanding Hawking radiation from simple models of atomic Bose-Einstein condensates

2012 · cited by 10

Paper [5] shows that spontaneous phonon emission in flowing Bose-Einstein condensates serves as a condensed-matter analog of Hawking radiation.

Analog Hawking radiation from a spin-sonic horizon in a two-component Bose–Einstein condensate

2024 · cited by 3

Paper [8] identifies observable signatures of Hawking processes using spin modes in a two-component Bose-Einstein condensate.

Analog Hawking Radiation on a 156-Qubit Superconducting Quantum Processor

2026 · cited by 1

Paper [11] reports the observation of kinematic analog Hawking radiation on a superconducting quantum processor.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked31 Jul 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 8731 Jul 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Diglossia is a situation where two dialects or languages are used by a single speech community?Is it true that Pointing out a person's hypocrisy is not always a logical fallacy?Is it true that The calcite compensation depth determines where calcium carbonate dissolution equals supply in ocean sediments.?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: the research is thin, dig deeper

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt