Recognizing speech in a noisy background is harder when the background is time-forward than for time-reversed speech, a masker direction effect, and harder when the masker is in a known rather than an unknown language, indicating linguistic interference. We examined the masker direction effect when the masker was a known vs unknown language and calculated performance over 50 trials to assess differential masker adaptation. In experiment 1, native English listeners transcribing English sentences showed a larger masker direction effect with English than Mandarin maskers. In experiment 2, Mandarin non-native speakers of English transcribing Mandarin sentences showed a mirror pattern. Both experiments thus support the target-masker linguistic similarity hypothesis, where interference is maximal when target and masker languages are the same. In experiment 3, Mandarin non-native speakers of English transcribing English sentences showed comparable results for English and Mandarin maskers. Non-native listening is therefore consistent with the known-language interference hypothesis, where interference is maximal when the masker language is known to the listener, whether or not it matches the target language. A trial-by-trial analysis showed that the masker direction effect increased over time during native listening but not during non-native listening. The results indicate different target-to-masker streaming strategies during native and non-native speech-in-speech listening.

Abstract Learning to process speech in a foreign language involves learning new representations for mapping the auditory signal to linguistic structure. Behavioral experiments suggest that even listeners that are highly proficient in a non-native language experience interference from representations of their native language. However, much of the evidence for such interference comes from tasks that may inadvertently increase the salience of native language competitors. Here we tested for neural evidence of proficiency and native language interference in a naturalistic story listening task. We studied electroencephalography responses of native Dutch listeners to an English short story, spoken by a native speaker of either American English or Dutch. We modeled brain responses with multivariate temporal response functions, using acoustic and language models. We found evidence for activation of Dutch language statistics when listening to English, but only when it was spoken with a Dutch accent. This suggests that a naturalistic, monolingual setting decreases the interference from native language representations, whereas an accent in the listeners’ own native language may increase native language interference, by increasing the salience of the native language and activating native language phonetic and lexical representations. Brain responses suggest that words from the native language compete with the foreign language in a single word recognition system, rather than being activated in a parallel lexicon. We further found that secondary acoustic representations of speech (after 200 ms latency) decreased with increasing proficiency. This may reflect improved acoustic-phonetic models in more proficient listeners.

How does cognitive inhibition influence speaking? The Stroop effect is a classic demonstration of the interference between reading and color naming. We used a novel variant of the Stroop task to measure whether this interference impacts not only the response speed, but also the acoustic properties of speech. Speakers named the color of words in three categories: congruent (e.g., <i>red</i> written in red), color-incongruent (e.g., <i>green</i> written in red), and vowel-incongruent - those with partial phonological overlap with their color (e.g., <i>rid</i> written in red, <i>grain</i> in green, and <i>blow</i> in blue). Our primary aim was to identify any effect of the distractor vowel on the acoustics of the target vowel. Participants were no slower to respond on vowel-incongruent trials, but formant trajectories tended to show a bias away from the distractor vowel, consistent with a phenomenon of <i>acoustic inhibition</i> that increases contrast between confusable alternatives.