trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Alvin Plantinga introduced the concept of a properly basic belief
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
4 sources for · 0 against

Alvin Plantinga is widely recognized as the principal philosopher who introduced and defended the concept that certain religious beliefs, particularly belief in God, can be 'properly basic.'

Evidence for · 4
cited by 0
Reference article covering this claim directly
See more details
How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the historical reference record, not journal abstracts.

More for · 3
cited by 0
Reference article covering this claim directly
2015 · cited by 0
Mentions Plantinga's work on proper basicality in Warranted Christian Belief.
2020 · cited by 0
Discusses Plantinga's philosophy including basic beliefs.
Everything we examined (9)
  1. Wikipedia: Alvin Plantingareferencesupports
  2. Wikipedia: Reformed epistemologyreferencesupports
  3. Book: Plantinga's 'Warranted Christian Belief'referencesupports
  4. Book: Jewish Theology and World Religionsreferencesupports
  5. Book: Analytic Philosophy of Religionreferencesupportsnot shown: a book whose author and subject did not establish authority here
  6. Book: Readings in the Philosophy of Religionreferencesupportsnot shown: beyond the two books we show per side
  7. Book: The Philosophy of Religionreferencesupportsnot shown: beyond the two books we show per side
  8. Book: Reason & Religious Beliefreferencesupportsnot shown: a book whose author and subject did not establish authority here
  9. OpenAIRE: The concept of «warrant» of the christian belief in Alvin Plantinga`S theistic philosophypeer-reviewedsupports
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7505 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt