trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
All eye drops for dry eyes contain steroids
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 5 against

The claim that all eye drops for dry eye contain steroids is incorrect. Many common dry eye treatments, such as cyclosporine, diquafosol, and rebamipide, are non-steroidal.

Evidence against · 5
2023 · cited by 60
Paper [0] evaluates cyclosporine eye drops for dry eye disease, which are non-steroidal immunomodulators rather than steroids.
See more details
The analysis

The claim asserts that all dry eye drops contain steroids. Multiple retrieved papers discuss non-steroidal treatments for dry eye disease, including cyclosporine, diquafosol, and rebamipide. Therefore, the claim is clearly false.

More against · 4
2022 · cited by 51
Paper [1] discusses the use of both cyclosporine and corticosteroids as distinct treatment options for dry eye disease, showing that not all dry eye drops are steroids.
2023 · cited by 13
Paper [4] examines topical cyclosporine 0.1% for dry eye disease, demonstrating the use of non-steroidal therapeutic drops.
2023 · cited by 13
Paper [5] investigates diquafosol eye drops as a non-steroidal treatment alternative for dry eye disease.
2023 · cited by 12
Paper [6] assesses rebamipide ophthalmic suspension as a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory eye drop for dry eye disease.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1104 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt